[x] doubt. If that was true that would of been a gameplay trailer
Agreed, however even if it can feasibly look like that it will never look that good on my computer.
Because it’s not releasing on PC?
😢 I didn’t realize they were still doing that dumb shit…
Rockstar giving the middle finger to PC players is one of the few constants in the gaming universe.
In fairness, their first trailers for the past 2 GTA games haven’t been gameplay, so I assume they’re just keeping with that pattern. And also those trailers did look similar to the final game, not exact but I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to expect GTA VI to look this good on max settings.
Framerate on the other hand, maybe to look this good it’ll have to be 30 which won’t be nice
Based on how late into the console Gen it is releasing wouldn’t be surprised if their strategy is 30 fps and then selling a 60+ fps version remaster for next Gen consoles, and then 18 months later a PC version.
Yeah, maybe it could look like that, but obviously they haven’t actually implemented everything to make it look like that, so it’s still completely up in the air, whether it actually will look like that.
Would’ve
Not a big deal but it’s would have, not would have.
My phone automatically corrects when I try to type would 0f now, even just when I’m making fun of people who say that.
It’s baffling.
But will it still be plagued by their lazy mission design and gross monetization?
deleted by creator
GTA V’s single player content support was immediately cut when they found how much money their MMO style game makes by F2P monetization.
We will see the same terrible business tactics: Delay PC release so much that people buy the console versions, the PC release will be superior thanks to the then progressed technical advancements and the mod support to double dip, and then triple dip, because new content will be online only with MTX, if they don’t abolish single player from the get go.
It’s sad because DLCs were a great way to get new story based content without having to wait over a decade for a sequel. Same with Red Dead Redemption. Seeing the map south open up and having no missions there that could have been used for future story DLCs was depressing.
I hate that so many people are drawn to spending money on online mtx. I never saw the appeal of spending money there, but tons of people love it. Kind of wish I loved it as much as they do so I wouldn’t be so bothered by the departure from story DLCs.
“Our game is so immersive, if you dont pay 16% interest monthly for your vehicle, it gets repo’d. But our new and improved shark cards can cut that interest in half for a small price of $60, or $120 to reclaim the vehicle that very moment.”
They’ve normally been pretty good about keeping that shit away from the single player side of things.
Couldn’t give a fuck about multiplayer, they can sign people up for medical experiments in exchange for funbucks for all I care. That side of it just doesn’t interest me at all. If I wanted to be called a homosexual slur by an eight year old I’d go to the park.
Kids just don’t randomly yell Hurensohn at strangers in the park like they used to, must be why MMO is successful
No gameplay, no hype, thems the rules
IMO, no reviews, no hype.
If true, those are some pretty impressive graphics. However, I suspect it’d come at the expense of controls feeling sluggish - realistic animation means your character won’t instantly move when you push the button/key. As nice as GTA5 and RDR2 looked, I found the perceived input delay annoying as fuck.
Yup. If it’s not fluid it’s a major deal-breaker for me
It hasn’t been fluid since the PS2/Xbox era and even those weren’t exactly tight controls.
Oh please rockstar, I’ve heard this dozens of times in the past
i mean, it wasn’t that much better than rdr2 on pc… it felt very believable to me
Well yeah, it didn’t look that amazing. It’s hardly photorealistic.
It looked pretty much exactly what I’d expect a modern PS5 GTA game to look like.
The graphics looks realistic, the movement gives it away that it’s a game.
I mean, it looked basically like something a talented modder could put into the GTA 5 engine (followed, I’m sure, by an instant cease-and-desist or lawsuit by Take2) so… yeah, I’m sure it is. Big whoop? GTA 5 looks OK but it is also ten fucking years old.
Removed by mod
that’s eight years ago
I believe this statement partially, because the lighting of the car headlight cone was the same bad one as we know from GTA IV. That must be in-engine if not actual in-game. What I am worried about is whether the game engine will feature more advanced physics and cop chases. As a result while GTA 5 was the better game, I think the free roaming experience suffered a lot from GTA IV, where the physics gave the world more dynamic opportunities. At the time it was probably done to optimize the abysmal performance.
Wow trailer looked great, but I definitely said to myself that this could just be prerenders
Digital Foundry does some analysis of the trailer here https://youtu.be/obiC2OzgThc?si=dPU3GSoTTQACtZRj
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/obiC2OzgThc?si=dPU3GSoTTQACtZRj
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
deleted by creator
PC is perfectly able to have that graphic now
Does people still trust empty promises like this?
deleted by creator
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/obiC2OzgThc?si=dPU3GSoTTQACtZRj
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Well I have never heard this exact statement before about any other games only for it to turn out to be untrue. 🙂
I mean it didn’t look like anything that couldn’t be done in realtime