It’s a meme

  • J Lou@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never said that people couldn’t get fired.

    The incompetent relative example seems to be a problem with nepotism

    • Devouring@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. It’s a nepotism problem. I’m just drawing the picture that removing money from the picture basically makes relationships the new currency. It’s basically how life used to be a long time ago, and those who were closer to the leader got better jobs with perks. People will always find a way to benefit and will centralize power eventually. I can’t say much about hypotheticals and whether your coop will fix that, but in my opinion, history suggests that we’ll just end up with a new system of power.

      • J Lou@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I never said anything about removing money.

        What you are talking about is called social capital accumulation, which is a problem in any system.

        A justification for worker coops is the moral principle of assigning legal responsibility to the de facto responsible party. In an employer-employee relationship, the employer receives 100% of the legal responsibility despite the employee being inextricably co-responsible. This violates the aforementioned principle

        • Devouring@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I don’t think you can use written laws to fight human plans to centralize power. I guess our current system is proof of that. People will always find a way to centralize that power to benefit themselves and their groups.

          But anyway. I guess we’re getting into a dead end. This is becoming opinion stuff at this point, whether this will work. I’ll have to think more about this stuff.