TLDR: XFCE and Cinnamon devs are begging beginning to work on Wayland support.

  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least the Mint devs are being realistic on the time span needed for Wayland to have a chance at working for everyone, unlike Fedora, KDE, and Gnome that are jumping the gun.

        • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Since we’re going with anecdotal evidence, I’ve been using Wayland daily for over a year and haven’t had any issues related to it

          • Magickmaster@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            While maybe sometimes buggy, at least things run. I’m all for modernization, but if there are compatibility problems with recent software, I’m not OK with it being declared “the better, mature standard thing everybody should now use”.

    • IverCoder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If nobody does that, nobody will be using Wayland to report issues.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cinnamon and XFCE are outliers in that they try to be super stable, “complete” desktops, compared to GNOME and KDE that try to be bleeding edge and packed with new and changing features.

      Benefits to both, but I can respect why Cinnamon and XFCE have been slow to adopt Wayland (to a fault, many would argue)