cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/44022276
Jolla may not be a household name, but for more than a decade the Finnish company has positioned its Linux-based Sailfish OS as an alternative to the mobile software duopoly that is Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS.
Now, 13 years since it tried to cut through the market with the Jolla Phone—a device which remarkably received software updates through 2020—it’s back with a successor of the same name.
This time, the company is positioning its handset as the “European phone.” This bit of marketing caters to the growing distrust in US digital services and platforms that has arisen since Big Tech sidled up to the second Trump administration.
The new Jolla Phone (pronounced “Yolla”) costs €649, mimics the Scandinavian design of the original, and has secured more than 10,000 preorders since its preview in December 2025. Those orders are expected to begin shipping at the end of June. At Mobile World Congress 2026 in Barcelona this week, the company divulged more details about the phone’s hardware.
Alt Android
Jolla has had a turbulent history. After the company floundered the launch of its Jolla Tablet in 2015, it nearly went bankrupt and pivoted to licensing Sailfish OS to automotive companies and governments, including Russia. After the invasion of Ukraine, Jolla had to cut ties with Russia, and a corporate restructuring meant that Jolla’s assets were acquired by the company’s former management under a new company called Jollyboys.
It got back into the smartphone game in 2024 with the Jolla C2 Community Phone, made in collaboration with a local Turkish company, and it was this experience that gave Jolla the courage to jump back into the hardware business with the new Jolla Phone. Unlike the C2, this device is completely assembled in Salo, Finland, where Nokia phones were manufactured more than a decade ago.
“Europeans want more European technology,” Sami Pienimäki, CEO of Jolla Mobile, tells WIRED. “People want to go away from Big Tech, and the other trend is that European people want sovereign tech—it makes it possible for our kind of company to have a position in the market.”
Building a smartphone from scratch was also much harder over a decade ago, but today, Pienimäki says the operation can be fairly lean without having to “pay too much up-front.”
The components are sourced from various vendors and countries. The MediaTek Dimensity 7100 5G chip hails from Taiwan; the 50-megapixel main and 13-megapixel ultrawide camera sensors are from Sony; the 8 or 12 GB of RAM is from SK Hynix in South Korea.
“There are Chinese components as well—we are totally open about it—but the key is that, as we compile the software ourselves and install it in Finland, we protect the integrity of the product,” Pienimäki says.
What makes Sailfish OS unique over competitors like GrapheneOS and e/OS is that it’s not based on the Android Open Source Project, but Linux. That means it has no ties to Google—no need for the company to “deGoogle” the software; meaning there’s a greater sense of sovereignty over the software (and now the hardware). Still, it’s able to run Android apps, though the implementation isn’t perfect. Another common criticism is that it’s not as secure as options like GrapheneOS, where every app is sandboxed.
There’s a good chance some Android apps on Sailfish OS will run into issues, which is why in the startup wizard the phone will ask if you want to install services like MicroG—open source software that can run Google services on devices that don’t have the Google Play Store, making it an easier on-ramp for folks coming from traditional smartphones without a technical background. You don’t even need to create a Sailfish OS account to use the Jolla Phone.
Jolla’s effort is hardly the first to push the anti–Big Tech narrative. A wave of other hardware and software companies offer a deGoogled experience, whether that’s Murena from France and its e/OS privacy-friendly operating system or the Canadian GrapheneOS, which just announced a partnership with Motorola. At CES earlier this year, the Swiss company Punkt also teamed up with ApostrophyOS to deploy its software on the new MC03 smartphone. Jolla is following a broader European trend of reducing reliance on US companies, like how French officials ditched Zoom for French-made video conference software earlier this year.
Murena CEO and founder Gaël Duval wrote in a statement emailed to WIRED that the company believes it has a different mission from the Jolla Phone as it’s trying to bring the existing mobile app ecosystem—minus the permanent data collection by Google and third-party trackers—without a learning curve for the average person. “We want to make privacy possible for the everyday person without the need for technical expertise or a development background,” he says.
The Phone
A common problem with these niche smartphones is that they inevitably end up costing a lot of money for the specs. Take the Light Phone III, for example, a fairly low-tech anti-smartphone that doesn’t enjoy the benefits of economies of scale, resulting in an outlandish $699 price. The Jolla Phone is in a similar boat, though the specs-to-value ratio is a little more respectable.
It’s powered by a midrange MediaTek Dimensity 7100 5G chip with 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB of storage, plus a microSD card slot and dual-SIM tray. There’s a 6.36-inch 1080p AMOLED screen, the two main cameras, and a 32-megapixel selfie shooter. The 5,500-mAh battery cell is fairly large considering the phone’s size, though the phone’s connectivity is a little dated, stuck with Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.4.
Uniquely, the Jolla Phone brings back “The Other Half” functional rear covers from the original. These swappable back covers have pogo pins that interface with the phone, allowing people to create unique accessories like a second display on the back of the phone or even a keyboard attachment. There’s an Innovation Program where the community can cocreate functional covers together and 3D-print them. And yes, a removable rear cover means the Jolla Phone’s battery is user-replaceable.
Pienimäki says that while the device doesn’t have FCC approval, you can theoretically import it into the US, and it should work with the major US carriers, though compatibility is rarely a given. Jolla is considering a separate US launch, though right now it’s focusing on the European Union, the UK, Norway, and Switzerland.
Antti Saarnio, Jolla Group’s chairperson, reiterates that the Jolla Phone will be a niche product. “Most of the people using Android or iOS will not switch, but we should treat this as a stepping stone for something new,” Saarnio says. The “path to real volume” will come from the mobile market breaking down into new form factors, powered by artificial intelligence.
He’s likely referring to Jolla’s Mind2, a privacy-focused AI computer, which is still in active development. It plugs into a PC and connects Jolla’s AI assistant to apps like email and calendar locally—no cloud access required. The chatbot-like interface lets you ask it questions about your data, whether you’re fishing for something from an email or a private message. While the new Jolla Phone won’t have any AI capabilities at launch, Saarnio says an integration will be an option users can enable later this year.
Jolla has street cred for supporting its devices for a long time, but we’ll have to wait and see how the fresh hardware holds up and just how much the company has polished the Sailfish OS experience, especially since it’s much easier today to get started with a deGoogled Android alternative.
unfortunately, like its predecessor (Nokia’s Maemo/Meego), Jolla’s SailfishOS has never been (and has never had plans to be) fully free/libre open source software.
many components of it are freely licensed, but not nearly enough to constitute an actual mobile operating system you can use.
why dont people just fork android and do an actual community version with blackjack and hookers?
https://lineageos.org/
For clarity, it is a soft fork. Earlier called CyanogenMod, it depends entirely on AOSP development.
The real solution is to move away from Android and Google.already on lineage 🫡 just kinda hurts to fight against integrity every once in a while, while keeping my modules compatible.
“Just”
From my understanding, the biggest issue is that just about every smartphone is closed hardware with no real info on how to make drivers, so it’s extremely difficult to get hardware support.
Really interested in where this could go, the fact we don’t have at least another viable OS is crazy, there needs to be a third, an open OS (truly)
they’re latching on to the “go euro” trend, hoping this will send some wind in their sails. it won’t.
they need to fully opensource the thing and invest in supporting the tinkerers and the enthusiasts. what they got now with only some experia models and paying for licences and whatnot couldn’t be more of a deterrent. I can assure you, you’re not losing paying customers with giving the OS away, every tinkerer is gonna bring you at least 20 paying customers.
the only way you’re gonna sell those things is by having a wide and knowledgable user base that will work as your sales people. ubuntu has been at this for, what, three decades and is still lightyears away from being a household name. jolla’s gonna need fucking eons with this spiel.
when those early adopters iron out the bugs and port shit over, then the normies will come calling and then they’ll go how can I get this without the tinkering and flashing and touching someone’s used yucky phone, and then jolla can go here you go, give us bricks of cash.
the idea that we’re gonna shell out 10x the price of a postmarketOS-capable handset to beta-test the thing, I mean sure that’s possible; it’s just not very likely.
The license is a one time payment for third party models. All of them are already aging. The C2 was a white label phone for Sailfish OS, the first dedicated Sailfish OS device in years and does not require any license nor does the new to be launched “Jolla Phone”. Most people ordered the Jolla Phone at 580 EUR. Whatever “postmarketOS-capable” phone you were thinking about but for 58 EUR it can’t be that great. Even cheaper Chinese competition equivalent hardware will cost around 200 EUR. The only Dimensity 7100 device I could find at this point was 260 EUR or so, with a worse screen.
I do agree that they should go fully open source but they are at least gradually opening up those parts that are still closed (mostly UI and some few stock apps). Sailffish OS is light years from mainstream adoption, at the very least. But that is not the game they are playing. This is a niche product for people that either want to get away from Google or Apple, or some that actually like the fairly unique UI of Sailfish OS or like to tinker with its Linux base (whatever you think about Sailfish OS and its not entirely open nature, it is still the most functional Linux based alternative out there, when it comes to functioning as a phone, including VoLTE, camera etc, at least in Europe).
Jolla has been years out of the wheel when it comes to own hardware. The crucial thing they need to prove now is that they are capable of delivering what they announced at maybe 15-20k sales.
The main question is how is their security?
Proprietary
If there’s no option to buy it without a broadband processor, the answer is “bad”
And can you verify that yourself?
What, does everyone need to be a mobile security researcher to care about security?
Most people can’t. But they can still choose options that are vetted by security experts in the community, and in the case of GrapheneOS also backed up by leaks from internal docs from Cellebrite, etc.
Uh, that’s what i meant, not You you but people you.
What makes Sailfish OS unique over competitors like GrapheneOS and e/OS is that it’s not based on the Android Open Source Project, but Linux.
Not only are AOSP and its derivatives also based on Linux, they are actually free software unlike Sailfish OS which contains some amount of proprietary code (I know at least the Android compatibility layer - which I’m told isn’t simply the AOSP runtime (as Waydroid uses) but some proprietary thing).
Why the scare quotes around ‘European’, is it EU or not?
Friendly reminder that EU != European
EU stands for European Union and is not comprised of all European countries.
Europe is used to refer to the continent and EU is used to refer to a political union of countries within Europe.
They explicitly call out some non-EU countries in Europe
Then they’re still European? Just none-EU
European - from the continent of Europe
This list is in-between. It doesn’t include all of Europe and it includes a bit more than the EU
Since this is published on Wired, you need to expect readers to not know the difference.
Also, manufacturing is done entirely in China. It is European as much as iPhone is American.
I used Sailfish OS on my good old Redmi Note 4 (mido). It was an interesting OS with the usual lack of niche apps for an alternative OS. Anyway, be cautious of Jolla’s history of broken promises. I’m not saying don’t buy, just be careful and level your expectations.
Plese tell me it’s small, lightweight, and has a 3.5 mm audio jack
It’s pretty average sized, but bad, but maybe good news on the headphone jack.
It doesn’t have one, but they plan to make accessories that replace the rear cover. But a DAC & headphone jack is sitting at #5 priority for that based on votes. But if they do make one of those, and use all the space to get level with the cameras for some decently big speakers, it would be so sick
All the best to Jolla - I wished their products would have succeeded 10 years back, they did manage to refund half my deposit when they didn’t back then. The world is more turbulent now, that may be a wave that pushes the little boat higher, or capsizes it again…
Know this Jolla crew: US residents also would like your phones to work here.
Will not be surprised if they (Big tech) somehow gatekeep US users if jolla gets more traction.
Haha are you talking about the Jolla tablet? I was actually excited for it, shame it never happened.
Yeah, it was probably the tablet… ultimately I wanted a phone but the tablet made sense at the time, or would have if they ever shipped it.
Pretty sure they will work. You just have to get a proxy to ship it to you, and possibly pay out the nose in import tariffs
Afaicr the bands were definitely not ideal for the US.
When did Finland ever make a good phone?
/s

Peak design. We have strayed from the Holy T9.
Are there any Linux phones in the US?
Dear Jolla, please make them available in the US.
if you have a lot of money, purism phones probably kinda work
You can get a FuriPhone flx1s, but I would only recommend it if you’re boþ a Linux enþusiast and you don’t depend on your phone for calls and text, and your Android app dependencies may or may not work.
agreed, but so far calls and text on my flx1s have been for some reason more stable than my past android phones? also I’m lucky to be using a bank who’s app works on custom roms (including the furiphone’s andromeda layer)
feels great having the same apps on my phone as on my Linux desktop
I mean, postmarketOS supports a pretty decent range, but as far as native Linux phones I’m right with you.
# Jolla Phone (Sep-II 2026)
The independent European Do It Together (DIT) Linux phone, shaped by the people who use it…
- Sailfish OS community members voted on what the next Jolla device should be. The key characteristics, specifications and features of the device.
Source: https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-sep-ii-2026
-–
Sailfish OS is an open platform based on Linux and over 500 open source projects. Licensees get full source code access to the OS, tooling, and infrastructure… 22 APIs… 31 policies…
…is compatible with the Android ecosystem, and so able to run Android apps and support Android device hardware. However, it’s fully independent, and not a derivative or a fork of the Android codebase…
…has great developer offering with fast cross-platform builds using Docker, a powerful command-line interface, improved coding assistance with Clang Code Model, 64-bit builds, C++14, Rust, CMake…
Source: https://sailfishos.org/
Related: https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/jolla-phone-update-lights-on-technical-bits-and-the-schedule/27821 ✨
“is compatible with the Android ecosystem” is a killer feature. Having the apps AND the open software would be very powerful.
However I will believe it when I see it.
their android compat layer is proper and actually works though proprietary afaik.
also afaik but their OS seemed to lack a decent browser, the best option was running firefox on the android compat layer…
Typing this reply via Voyager through the sailfishOS browser.
You’re right, its shit. Fennec via Android has to be called up way too often. But, to their credit, the android compat layer is second to none
i knew somebody here actually daily drives it :)
may i ask which device you use it on?
Yep, my primary phone is a Sony Xperia 10 IV on SailfishOS. If I had a working camera and could take a call without being forced to use speakerphone I’d be over the moon, but as it is it’s pretty neat and there aren’t otherwise too many day to day issues.
I have a 10 IV, and I can’t have sound in android apps (for signal calls for instance)
Did you manage to make it work?
I had the Jolla 1 (I feel old) and the compatibility was a real thing : even the bank application were working. I was able to use waze in the car with the phone.
Thing is lockdown and integrity checks are much stricter these days, and you can’t rely on these things to continue working either.
I’d have a backup phone to deal with id and banking.
Rust? You sure? At least it’s not official. Nor is any other productive language such as kotlin or c# with their GUIs. Sadly so, IMO.
Glad to see another Linux phone being added to the current handful - the more, the merrier.
I guess for Americans they can look into the PinePhone by Pine64. There are probably a few other manufacturers out there too.
costs €649
They never fucking learn.
What should they learn? To not make any revenue from a production of only 10,000 units?
It’s expensive to make small niche products.















