F_Haxhausen@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agoYummy Mummylemmy.worldimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1721arrow-down126
arrow-up1695arrow-down1imageYummy Mummylemmy.worldF_Haxhausen@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareprole@sh.itjust.workscakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-22 years agoI think mm/dd/yyyy is better than dd/mm/yyyy, because you can sort by the first number and the dates will be in chronological order (though I agree with the below comment that YYYY MM DD is the best).
I think mm/dd/yyyy is better than dd/mm/yyyy, because you can sort by the first number and the dates will be in chronological order (though I agree with the below comment that YYYY MM DD is the best).