Very difficult to discuss with the fiance without know the terminology yet lol

    • Communist@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like communities, honestly, it sounds much less… y’know, reddity?

      And also, it’s much more intuitive.

      • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think “sub” is what people are going to call them reguardless. It is just internet language at this point, a subdivision of a community (by community I mean lemmy as a whole) is called a sub. Weather it’s a subreddit or sublemmy. I’m not saying bring reddit with us, I am just saying the internet can take the term “sub” with it and use it elsewhere.

      • bnaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally that term makes me a bit uneasy. To me it sounds too grandiose and organized just for something that might just be some random people shitposting or chatting about their interests. And actually having tight knit communities can easily lead to all kinds of negative effects, group think, hierarchies and drama.

        Of course some subreddits, forums, lemmy communities etc can be actual communities but just as a personal preference I don’t like the idea of calling them that default.

        • BigUwU@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t like the term community because it’s difficult to understand the hierarchy. Is an instance a part of a community? Or vice versa?

          What do you think of subinstance?

          • amiuhle@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            But that’s a provider/customer relationship, on the fediverse it isn’t.

            • unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Agree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier

              • amiuhle@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.

                • unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Its not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a “provider” of a server and service. It’s not the worst moniker I have heard