caption

a screenshot of the text:

Tech companies argued in comments on the website that the way their models ingested creative content was innovative and legal. The venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, which has several investments in A.I. start-ups, warned in its comments that any slowdown for A.I. companies in consuming content “would upset at least a decade’s worth of investment-backed expectations that were premised on the current understanding of the scope of copyright protection in this country.”

underneath the screenshot is the “Oh no! Anyway” meme, featuring two pictures of Jeremy Clarkson saying “Oh no!” and “Anyway”

screenshot (copied from this mastodon post) is of a paragraph of the NYT article “The Sleepy Copyright Office in the Middle of a High-Stakes Clash Over A.I.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t give a shit about copyright for training AI.

    But I don’t give a shit about investors, either.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Copyright should ceise to exist and sharing digital copies of any content should be a protected right. The best software is foss anyway.

      But if i cant have that i will settle for techbross going to jail for mass theft. Either the law is equal or it is unlawful.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nah. Even in its current stupid state, copyright has to recognize that sifting through the entire internet to get a gigabyte of linear algebra is pretty goddamn transformative.

        No kidding the machine that speaks English read every book in the library. Fuck else was it gonna do?