this contradiction always confused me. either way the official company is “losing a sale” and not getting the money, right?

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Ehhh they’re technically wrong. You don’t own the media with physical formats either. There’s just nothing they can do about it if they want it out of your home.

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I believe there was a recent EU ruling that mandated that this must be allowed.

        I’m not sure of the details, however.

      • Oka@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        In a way, NFTs were supposed to solve this.

        • soren446@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          That was the only argument about NFTs that seemed interesting. But instead we got stupid cartoon monkeys.

          • fkn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nfts, digital tokens, already exist. Their use, in the protection of copyright, is called drm. “Nfts” bring nothing new to the table of digital rights or copyright… And a whole host of stupidity.

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That is no different with CDs, DVDs, etc. It’s written on all of them. It’s a limited license, which is why you can’t host screenings and charge people with your physical media.