• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some percentage of revenue for using other people’s IP is pretty normal.

    And I think it’s hard to argue Baldur’s Gate and using DnD isn’t a meaningful part of its success. Divinity Original Sin 2 is a really good game with a lot of the same DNA (it’s why I personally bought BG3), and it stayed pretty niche. The IP is a big part of it exploding.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d argue it had far more to do with it being another one of Larian’s RPGs with significantly more production value.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re underselling how massive the Baldur’s Gate name is.

        The exact same production in DOS3 wouldn’t have near the same runaway hype train.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would agree that it being DnD was part of its success but I still don’t think Hasbro deserves 90m for it

      • Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they got a percentage, would you have been happier if they only got ten million but a lot leas people bought the game? Idk what deal they had, however the game was great and a lot of people loved it. And so hasbro got a lot of money, this will hopefully encourage them to lease out more IPs.