• saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    How you gonna afford all the social schemes with no tax under $50K? I have “free” healthcare but it’s 2% of my taxable income. The taxable brackets start at $18,200 ($11,880 USD) here. You’ll need to ensure there is finance for social services else you’ll be bringing harm to your society in the form of failed infrastructure.

    • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Mainly: “Increase highest bracket tax (+5%)”, “VAT for luxury items”, “Collateral for loan is realized gain”. Universal basic income will put money back into the economy and generate sales tax. Legalizing marijuana will bring in tax revenue when regulated properly, same with prostitution. Universal healthcare will arguably save us money over time.

    • starlord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Taxing 50 thousand people earning $50k at just 1% gets you 25 mil.

      Taxing a single billion dollars (of which there are thousands among the top 1%) at 5% gets you twice that.

      Bezos’ net worth is around 210 with a capital B. Tax just him 5% and you could pay those 50k earners a 210k salary. One guy.

      Tax the rich.

      • starlord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        And by the way, that 2 trillion dollar tax cut they got from their orange canary god would’ve paid for the US military budget 3 times and still had enough left over to solve world hunger, educate everyone, and end homelessness.

        • starlord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          So sometimes it’s a wealth tax, not necessarily an income tax.

          Still, the top 10 billionaires are averaging +$40B/yr. Tap that for 5% and that’s $21B.

          Here’s some things you could afford with that money:

          • 250k people get a free $85k education.
          • 6 million kids get $20/day to eat a quality school lunch for a whole year.
          • 84k homeless people get a $250k house
          • Every teacher gets a $5k bonus

          And that’s just from 10 people, at 5%, one time.

          • Wanderer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The top 10 billionaires are not increasing their wealth by 40billions a year. So that’s wrong.

            Why wouldn’t they just take all their money out of America and invest in other countries?

            • starlord@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well, the tin-foil-hat answer is because they make more by investing it here, namely, in politicians. (Like Musk bought Twitter in an attempt to control the national discourse, so he could, you know, help influence who gets elected and make more money.)

              It’s probably just more profitable here. We’re a Capitalist nation. Capitalists are gonna wanna play our game. If you had a giant stack of bills in Monopoly, you wouldn’t take a bunch of them over to the Chutes and Ladders table.

              What do all men with power want? More power.

              • Wanderer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Oh god. Financial illiteracy and misandry this is everything wrong with Lemmy.

                There is tax avoidance and multiple other capitalist countries. Wealth tax will be exceptionally difficult to implement for billionaires.