The lawsuit caps years of regulatory scrutiny of Apple’s wildly popular suite of devices and services, which have fueled its growth into a nearly $3 trillion public company.
  • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
    5·
    8 months ago

    The quality isn’t really the issue, it’s when the company

    • prevents competing apps from being installed
    • prevents devices from other manufacturers from using your apps (or intentionally degrading services on other devices)
    • making it hard to use files/media outside the proprietary apps (ex. iTunes in the past, and maybe still now)

    This issue isn’t limited to Apple, but Apple is the well known example for locking people into an ecosystem whether they like it or not

    • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
      18·
      8 months ago

      Do you have an example of them rejecting a quality product from being used in their phones?

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          1·
          8 months ago

          Each developer will have to be authorized by Apple to switch engines “after meeting specific criteria and committing to a number of ongoing privacy and security mitigations,”

          Now they can babysit other browsers and make sure they’re secure too, ig. Might as well throw that responsibility on the trillion dollar company. At least the browsers will end up more secure once the apple security team audits them.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.caEnglish
        3·
        8 months ago

        You were already provided with examples in this comment thread:

        Non-apple watches, for instance, can’t use GPS from an iPhone or cause it to emit sound to local lost phones, despite being previously able to, demonstrating no technical limitations just a walled-garden limitation