• papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just passing through, no strong opinions on the matter nor is it something I wish to do deep dive research on.

      Just wanted to point out that your original comment was indeed just a threat that did nothing to address OPs argument.

            • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Hot take: yes. All art exists in a social context, and if the social context of your art is “this is a child and they are sexualized” then your art should be considered CSAM. Doesn’t matter if it’s in an anime style, a photorealistic style, or if it’s a movie where the children are fully clothed for the duration but are sexualized by the director as in Cuties - CSAM, CSAM, CSAM.

                • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  there cannot be developed a scale or spectrum to judge where the fake stops and real starts

                  Ah, but my definition didn’t at all rely on whether or not the images were “real” or “fake”, did it? An image is not merely an arrangement of pixels in a jpeg, you understand - an image has a social context that tells us what it is and why it was created. It doesn’t matter if there were real actors or not, if it’s an image of a child and it’s being sexualized, it should be considered CSAM.

                  And yes I understand that that will always be a subjective judgement with a grey area, but not every law needs to have a perfectly defined line where the legal becomes the illegal. A justice system should not be a computer program that simply runs the numbers and delivers an output.