Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square450linkfedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down1100
arrow-up1491arrow-down1imageMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square450linkfedilink
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoWithout reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agowhich seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoMaybe to you… To me it seems like you’re trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agowe haven’t said anything about my diet. i’m talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNo you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i’d prefer if you didn’t make tihs personal.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m not trying to make this about you, i’m just trying to respond to what I think you’re trying to argue that you didn’t explicitly say
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoHow can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You’re just being ridiculous now.
Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose.
which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked.
Maybe to you… To me it seems like you’re trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet
we haven’t said anything about my diet. i’m talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context.
No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying
i never made this about myself at all. i’d prefer if you didn’t make tihs personal.
I’m not trying to make this about you, i’m just trying to respond to what I think you’re trying to argue that you didn’t explicitly say
then kindly leave me out of your analysis.
How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You’re just being ridiculous now.