• sudo@programming.dev
        42·
        28 days ago

        I said “Islamic terrorism is almost exclusively the domain of wahhabi’s” and you’re argueing, “what if the CIA funded the wahhabi’s?” as though that contradicts my point.

        I don’t know what the disagreement is. Its always the wahhabi’s executing the actual terrorism. If you want to lump in their sponsors, like is said, “go off”. But you’re framing it like I’m ignorant of that which I’m not.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
          32·
          28 days ago

          and you’re argueing, “what if the CIA funded the wahhabi’s?” as though that contradicts my point.

          Is the CIA Wahhabist?

          • sudo@programming.dev
            22·
            28 days ago

            No. And no patience for the semantic argument you’re wasting my time with when we both agree on the material reality

              • sudo@programming.dev
                1·
                27 days ago

                I never said they didn’t arm them. I explicitly stated multiple times that we agreed on this front. All I stated is that the only islamists doing terrorism are the wahhabists and then you’re like “ah BUT did you consider that the CIA funded those terrorists???” as though that disproves anything I said.

                You tried to frame what should’ve been an “yes AND” as some disagreement. There is no disagreement.