no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoDarn itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down138
arrow-up1503arrow-down1imageDarn itlemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squareRhoeri@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·18 hours agoSomething about this felt wrong but I looked it up, and…. Nope. You’re absolutely correct! Damn. I had thought the classics were much faster than that, but a 1964 mustang only topped out at around 100mph.
minus-squareTwentySeven@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·17 hours agoYou picked a car with a small engine (for its time anyway). I don’t think a 64.5 mustang was ever considered a fast car.
minus-squareFartsWithAnAccent@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 hours agoI’ve done 120 in a basic-ass sedan lol, by modern standards their cars are shitty and slow. Gotta admit, some of them look good though.
Something about this felt wrong but I looked it up, and…. Nope. You’re absolutely correct! Damn. I had thought the classics were much faster than that, but a 1964 mustang only topped out at around 100mph.
You picked a car with a small engine (for its time anyway). I don’t think a 64.5 mustang was ever considered a fast car.
Fair point.
I’ve done 120 in a basic-ass sedan lol, by modern standards their cars are shitty and slow.
Gotta admit, some of them look good though.