Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoSeems like solid advicelemmy.worldimagemessage-square63linkfedilinkarrow-up1656arrow-down174
arrow-up1582arrow-down1imageSeems like solid advicelemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square63linkfedilink
minus-squareAcinonyx@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down23·1 year agoif males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
minus-squaretjsauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoBy disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up. The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
minus-squareAcinonyx@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agothat’s realistically more achievable than the other way around
if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.
The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
So your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
that’s realistically more achievable than the other way around