Hey folks. I recently got an old X220 with an mSATA SSD. I plan to to install Linux on there. It doesnt matter which OS: Debian, Ubuntu or Arch. The machine is so old that all distros play nice with it.

Anyway, the speed on the mSATA is slower than the 2.5 SSD. So I want to know if is it possible to have your /boot, /efi, swap on the mSATA. Then, the /home on the 2.5 SSD? Any problems with this setup and if anyone tried it before?

Now, for the reasons why I use mSATA instead of just putting Linux on 2.5 SSD:

  1. the mSATA is Samsung, pretty rare nowadays. The health is still very excellent. I checked with CrystalDiskInfo. So might as well use it.

  2. My X220 has a problem finding out grub if installed on the 2.5 SSD. It’s literally a 50/50 chance it can find grub properly. So:

a) you installed Linux on 2.5 SSD, reboot.

b) grub error screen

c) restart

d) boot into Linux well

Note at d) if I do anything to restart/shutdown the computer, you are back at step b) and require another reboot to reach Linux.

Any advice is welcome.

  • Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    4·
    2 hours ago

    Yes. I have an NVME as my OS drive but most of my home directory (Documents, Videos, Pictures, Music, etc.) is on an older large data HDD. My .config and anything else is still on the NVME. I use fstab to mount the directories automatically.

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.euEnglish
    11·
    3 hours ago

    Ha, home has been traditionally always on a separate drive. That’s the reason why root user has the home under /root and not /home/root, so that it can login even if the home drive didn’t Mount.

    As a curiosity, even /usr was traditionally on a separate drive and that’s why critical binaries and libraries where under /bin and /lib while all non critical stuff under /usr. It is called “split-usr”.

    Nowadays /usr is always on the same drive as root, and we moved to a “merge-usr” approach where stuff under /lib and /bin is a symlink into /usr/lib and /usr/bin.

    Because when HDDs where 50mb in size, even that small binary file counted as big :)

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    17·
    5 hours ago

    Mounting /home on a different device is common, shouldn’t be a problem. Universities used to mount you’re home dir off the network with nfs so that it followed you to any system you logged in to.

  • gandolfini_the_grey@lemm.eeEnglish
    3·
    5 hours ago

    First, of course it is completely fine for /home to be on another drive. As long as it is configured in /etc/fstab correctly, almost any configuration of drives and partitions is okay.

    Second, your boot issue sounds very strange. Firstly, x220 has a traditional bios boot, right? So you do not need an /EFI partition, and should install grub to the reserved space on the drive for booting (which if you configured MBR for your drive requires no change, if you configured GPT you need to reserve that space). If you have one of the x220s with libreboot (not sure if that exists, but I used to have an x200 with libreboot flashed for the bios), then your grub version might be very out of date, which could cause issues as well.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    1·
    4 hours ago

    The machine is so old that all distros play nice with it.

    Lmao, I’m using X230 as my on-the-go laptop unironically. Also FYI, older machine might not work as well. RHEL based distros have started to remove the support for Sandy & Ivy in their next releases.

    To answer your question, Linux doesn’t care which drive you put your /home. Hell, you can even mount /var or /usr on a different drive. It only care that you list it on fstab (or mount it manually, go to town!). It would just treat them like any other filesystem.

    I’ve never heard of that 2.5 SSD being problematic for boot drive before.