• simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I have! and it’s a great game but still not quite the level of HK

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It was, imo, the founder of the Vania part of Metroidvanias, so they didn’t have the benefit of standing upon many shoulders. Hollow Knight is a great spiritual successor to that endeavor, and I agree that they took much of what made SotN great and improved upon it.

      It’s interesting watching people get so excited by HK, I have to wonder if that’s what it was like when SotN and successive games came out.

      • pory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Symphony of the Night is, in fact, the origin of the term Metroidvania but not in the way you might think. Castlevania pre SotN was a very different series with none of the elements associated with “metroidvania”, so people started calling SOTN a “metroid-vania” derogatorily, as a Castlevania that was trying to ape Metroid. The term had staying power for the genre because what the fuck else are you gonna call them, it was before slapping -like on everything was popular but after calling stuff “clones” had fallen out of favor. No, “search action” will never be a thing. And you’re not just gonna call them Metroids because that’s one specific series. So after future Castlevanias had Metroidy stuff in them, it became a genre name.