Raccoonn@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoAI will never be able to write like me.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up11.6Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.58Karrow-down1imageAI will never be able to write like me.lemmy.mlRaccoonn@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squaresaigot@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoIf it was done with enough regularity to eb a problem, one could just put an LLM model like this in-between to preprocess the data.
minus-squareAzzu@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoThat doesn’t work, you can’t train models on another model’s output without degrading the quality. At least not currently.
minus-squareVashtea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoI don’t think he was suggesting training on another model’s output, just using ai to filter the training data before it is used.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoNo, that’s not true. All current models use output from previous models as part of their training data. You can’t solely rely on it, but that’s not strictly necessary.
If it was done with enough regularity to eb a problem, one could just put an LLM model like this in-between to preprocess the data.
That doesn’t work, you can’t train models on another model’s output without degrading the quality. At least not currently.
I don’t think he was suggesting training on another model’s output, just using ai to filter the training data before it is used.
No, that’s not true. All current models use output from previous models as part of their training data. You can’t solely rely on it, but that’s not strictly necessary.