systemd cat and GNU cat hugging a Linux cat.

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    Windows 11, but only for personal reasons. Mainly because it is the only OS that has proper HDR support. The moment Linux catches up (that includes either Nvidia or a 3rd party implementing RTX HDR support as well), I will stop dial dual-booting and go all in on Arch.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      This:

      screenshot of SystemD

      IDK why it’s bad, though. My only complaint is that it can take a long time to boot depending on your system, but I don’t think a SystemD issue.

  • OR3X@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Never had an issue with systemd and I’ve tinkered with it quite a bit, so I think I’ll just stick with an OS that uses it.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “systemd is the worst implementation of init, except all those other inits that have been tried from time to time” -Churchill, if he had been a nerd

  • wolf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Since you asked for OS and not Linux: OpenBSD and FreeBSD are beautiful systems w/o systemd. I would switch in a heartbeat if I wouldn’t need Linux for work reasons.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This feels like an “I would switch to Linux if I didn’t need Windows for work” comment from another universe.

      • wolf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Fair point. :-)

        At the end of the day, the OS has to run the software/applications one needs to get shit done… if it is macOS or Windows, that’s okay.

        In my defense, I ran NetBSD for several years a long time back, and it was one of the best OS experiences I ever had. I am just old/pragmatic/flexible enough, to choose setups with less friction, if possible. ;-)

        Still, I think it is a shame that Linux mostly took over the UNIX world and the BDS are left for hardcore nerds/embedding/game consoles and Solaris and co are not viable options anymore. Portable software and its stability benefited a lot from bugs detected on other platforms (OpenBSD was always a forerunner here).

        • wolf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not sure what you want to express. I actually used BSD a long time back, and the quality/documentation/coherence/beauty of the system are/were just on another level… Running Debian for nearly a decade now, because of compatibility (with hardware and software I need)… Linux improved a lot in the last nearly 3 decades and I am happy it exists, still I would be more happy if the BSDs would have stayed at least on an equal footing.

          • Shin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think the comment speaks for itself. There wasn’t anything deep behind it. It literally just mean “Linux users look at BSD users how Windows users look at Linux.” Bewildered, mystified maybe? It’s just lower on the “food chain”, and they are surprised to see people using it because it’s missing “X” feature they can’t live without, for many people that being gaming. I’m in the same camp.

            It was not a comment on the quality of the software, as I have never used it. I would love to tinker with it one day to see the differences, but I can’t see myself ever switching to it, even if I admire/envy some of the better parts compared to Linux.

            • tryagain@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I feel there’s a similar relation between Mac :: Ubuntu (me) :: Arch.

              I try to explain to folks that I have very little interest in anything outside of /home. I truly use Ubuntu because I like the desktop and Steam works and I have all the dev tools I need. But a certain type of otherwise competent Mac-using developer thinks I must be a 1337 h4x0r to even dare to use Linux for actual work.

              • Shin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Any “hate” in regards to you using Ubuntu is more likely to do with controversy involving Canonical than it is you using a beginner-friendly distro. People are more likely to be kinder to the Mint user.

            • wolf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Thanks for clarification!

              … and I think you are point on, by now, the ship has sailed. I could use FreeBSD/OpenBSD on servers, but I’d rather run Debian everywhere. On desktops and for day to day usage, the BSDs are no viable options anymore, they simply lack support for common hardware (Wifi etc.) alone and the BSDs will realistically never be able to catch up the chasm anymore.