And from the glowing reviews it’s clear that

  1. W11 doesn’t actually need a new PC to run and the limitations are completely artificial

  2. For many people, a ten years old PC is fast enough (or even faster than a brand new Intel N100 PC that is officially W11 compatible). They won’t even notice that’s something from 2015, as long it has a shiny new case, enough RAM and SSD

  3. Amazon doesn’t care that the PC comes with pirated software, or that someone is scamming their customers, as long they get their 15% cut from marketplace sales (the cost of a genuine license of W11 pro and office exceeds the price of those ewaste specials)

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOPEnglish
    1·
    9 hours ago

    Yes ok from an accounting point of view.

    But from a functional point of view?

    I see how my bank teller works: they connect to a terminal server

    I see how my other bank works: a VM that runs AS/400 that is acting as a terminal to their mainframe

    Why they’re changing computers so often? The first one can use any PC released in the past 15 years and the second one can use any released in the past 30 years

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.socialEnglish
      1·
      22 minutes ago

      I can’t speak to your specific examples since I don’t work there.

      The reasons beyond caper considerations are things like security, compliance, warranty coverage expiration, standardization across the org, general employee satisfaction, hardware falling out of vendor support.

      I doubt the banks computers are single purpose or purchased specifically for each job role. Sure a 15 or 30 year old computer might technically work but there’s no way it’ll meet regulatory security compliance rules.

      The home user/hobbyist approach really doesn’t scale to corporate IT.