Hi. I wanted to know if it’s needed to install a firewall on a linux desktop/laptop. Why yes or why no?

  • blarp@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey thank you for this comment. I was just following the ArchWiki and you can also find similar directions here. I think the idea is that on a home network, every device can be trusted, but it’s still good to have a firewall in case your ISP’s firewall is crappy. What do you think?

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your isp firewall uses nat, and a hacked isp gateway or some other device that had ports forwarded to it are the most likely things to be reaching into your network. They’ll be on that subnet.

      • blarp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ohhh of course. Thank you.

        So the more practical solution is just to assign a static IP to all my trusted devices, then allow those IP addresses rather than the whole subnet.

        That makes total sense, but why do you think the ArchWiki says otherwise? Do you think they’re just presenting a “just werks” solution?

        • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, they’re giving “very simplistic” and also demonstrating how to deny and add access in multiple ways.

          It’s also not uncommon to do things like that. The default firewall config in Fedora is wide open for every port above 1024.

          • blarp@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are a rock star.

            Okay, I now have new awesome rules! I assigned my other two machines static IPs (192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4, respectively). So now I have:

            sudo systemctl enable --now ufw
            sudo ufw default deny
            sudo ufw allow from 192.168.1.3
            sudo ufw allow from 192.168.1.4
            sudo ufw limit ssh
            sudo ufw enable
            

            SSH still works, everything is awesome. Thanks again 👏👏👏

          • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I set up a rule last night to allow SSH access from any device on my subnet, is it a good idea to add a separate rule blocking SSH from my router? I’ve already set up SSH with public key authentication so in theory there aren’t many devices that can access it but the firewall restriction seemed like a good idea

            • Turun@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you are worried that an attacker may have compromised your router and that key auth is not secure enough, then yes it would make sense.

              I move ssh to a non-default port, only allow key based auth and install fail2ban. This is enough for me. It protects against automated attacks hitting port 22 and prevents brute force.

              • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think my router has been compromised and I think it’s pretty unlikely it will be, but the extra rule seems pretty trivial to set up so if there are no downsides I may as well! I have already changed the SSH port and disabled password login. I’ll look into fail2ban, might be worth it if it’s relatively simple to set up!