Of course he liked crosses! There was even that one cross he used to hang at.

It never gets to 60. For some odd reason it only gets to 59 and then drops back to zero.

The dishes want some privacy in their bath.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/it.humor.and.memes/posts/28661227206809691/

What if I yell “no homo!” when I plug it in?

It’s Rule 34. It’s always real.

The ability to the cat

You get one hell of a migraine every time you use it.

I do, but not for writing code. I use them when I can’t think of a name for something. LLMs are pretty good at naming things. Probably not that good with cache invalidation though…

In the end I think scripture is just a tool for Jews to have something to argue about endlessly.

Considering how that’s the main way to gain fame in Judaism - you’re not wrong.

I like Rabbi Joseph Bekhor Shor’s interpretation. It’s far from being accepted in Judaism - probably because it makes so much sense.

The interpretation is based on the fact that the passage originally appears in Exodus twice - but not in a section about Kosher laws. It appears in sections about Bikurim - bringing offerings to the temple:

• https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+23%3A14-19&version=CSB
• https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+34%3A22-26&version=CSB

The very same verse that contains that law also contains a law about Bikkurim:

Bring the best firstfruits of your land to the house of the Lord your God.

You must not boil a young goat in its mother’s milk.

Because these two laws seem so unrelated, Rabbi Joseph Bekhor Shor suggests a different way to read the second part.

In Hebrew, the root of the word “cook”/“boil” is B-SH-L - and this is also the root of the word “ripe”/“mature”. Because of that, it’s possible to read “you must not boil a young goat in its mother’s milk” as “you must not let a young goat mature while drinking its mother’s milk”.

This makes the second part of the verse a repetition of the first part - a pattern very common in the Old Testament as a (vain) attempt to prevent misinterpretations. Reading it like so, both parts mean “the offerings should be as young and as fresh as possible”.

That reading is a little bit odd - but not too odd in biblical language standards, and it makes so much more sense in the context where the passage appears.

This generation really is doomed - but not because of these words (or anything else it does, really)

Good thing they lost the elections then, right?

chmod +x virus
sudo ./virus

-1/12

I like the description by a Finn who said: Rust is like a car with automatic, while in C (or Zig) you need to change the gears.

I don’t think this metaphor is correct. The automatic gear’s analogy would be the Garbage Collector, which almost every mainstream language has. Rust’s memory management, in comparison, is still manual. Maybe not as manual as C or Zig - but I’d say about as manual as C++. The difference is not that it has some weird gear-changing (memory cleanup) scheme that does not require human intervention - it’s that it yells at you when you don’t do the regular gear changing (memory management) properly.

These people probably feel so ashamed they can’t even look at themselves in the mirror.

<= makes sense if you start from 1.

Communism is just socialism-flavored fascism.