deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It really is quite useful for a certain user.
It has a really great selection of polished layouts OOTB that can make GNOME look very familiar to whatever the user is used to.
Also has some other great tweaks around WINE for beginners, and a more easily accessible Nvidia option in install media.
I don’t use it myself, but I would suggest it is ideal for someone who is a basic computer user who wants to mostly web browse and use home office tools. It really is ultra-polished.
Yes this could mostly be replicated with extensions and themes, but honestly, unless you have strong feelings about your OS, which most people don’t, it is not worth messing about with this (particularly when installing for others) when Zorin is available; it can be a headache to have to maintain such comprehensive layout changes through extensions and themes without breakage throughout upgrades. It also has the benefits of being based on the very actively developed GNOME, compared to something with a smaller team like Cinnamon, namely much better Wayland support, and in my view more polish.
Also limiting rule updates to new extension versions will essentially make it impossible for adblockers to outpace anti-adblock interventions.
Why do you expect that Edge wouldn’t adopt Google-like MV3 along with Chrome?
Microsoft adopted Chromium in order to minimise development costs in a product it doesn’t see as core, something which would be incurred if it had to maintain its own fork of mv3, and is incentivized through Bing to pursue a similar approach.
iOS is already very similar to what Google is trying to implement here, although extension rulesets in iOS can be updated out of band.
iOS 17 has a documented limit of 150k rules, half of what is often required for a comprehensive content blocker, and presently has a “bug” that limits is to 30k to 40k rules at most.
Fedora is on a six monthly cycle just like non-LTS Ubuntu; neither distro is on a yearly release cycle. The previous release is just supported for an extra six months, for one year of support per release for Fedora.
Fedora itself isn’t rolling but the kernel and mesa packages do roll between releases, and it is more bleeding edge than Ubuntu generally.
Manjaro has too many issues that are well documented with instability and security for new users.
Nothing. OP is being an idealogue that is doing a disservice to new users.
Snap can be undesirable for some, but honestly Ubuntu works very well for beginners and arguably has a more intuitive gnome interface by default.
Even then it is 200 series and up. 100 and back through to 900 will still not just work at this stage.
Isn’t turning off the screen better?
OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD all support or are planning to support Wayland.
FreeBSD runs Wayland just fine. I run it on one of my boxes.
OpenBSD is also working on Wayland support.
NetBSD I’m unsure of, as their development pace is quite slow.
Yes, FreeBSD already allows running Wayland. On my FreeBSD box, I have run it just fine.
OpenBSD are also working towards it.
I’m not sure about NetBSD.
That’s exactly the case.
You are describing a different scenario to myself here though.
There is nothing wrong with helping to direct people to the manual of course if it is genuinely of use.
There are many who are not as friendly as you in my experience who use these queries more a flex of their perceived superiority than any genuine attempt to be helpful.
It is these people who view arch as some sort of elite status symbol that makes them superior geniuses that are toxic.
It can produce more savings sure in terms of electricity costs, but when including capital, solar is presently much more cost effective. In my area some 6.8kw panels have a four year ROI.
I’m curious what sized system you are putting in that costs that much.
An 8kw solar system usually costs a bit over $8k and at least in many areas seems to have a ROI of a bit over 6 years at most and often much less.
Mostly to learn about it’s unique selling points.
I think it is very interesting in terms of the easy deployment of specific environments, and in terms of writing recipes for new packages.
Having said that, outside of these two rather niche areas for home use, I think it is rather unintuitive and offers no real advantages over more established players that offer a more polished experience, like Fedora for workstation and gaming use.
Is there something that attracts you to NixOS for that purpose?
I’ve got Nix OS running on one of my computers, and honestly, haven’t found it to be particularly notable for those usecases.
Why on Earth are these nonsense blog rants constantly upvoted here?
It is essentially an unlettered rant that conflates the author’s UI and toolkit preferences with an objective view.
It doesn’t even provide a useful comparison to the evolution of QT to provide for a meaningful reference of its implied assertion that the evolution of GTK is too rapid for devs.