Yeah you’re probably right. I was just looking right above the highest point of the cat’s back where there’s a missing dot. In one image there’s four that form a square, in the other the bottom right dot is missing

Zooming in now tho it looks like the image with the darker cat is heavily compressed, so that particular dot probably just got lost in the process

Different details on the back wall too. Very strange. Possibly at some point someone ran it through an AI filter to get it to look like their cat?

Oof, this is a little too intense. Could we get a version where a relatively thin red line is striking through the word “kill”?

Nah don’t apologize, your posts slap harder than his balls in my face

I was reading some breakdown recently, forget if it was the CDC or whoever, but basically they found that the vast majority of Americans were totally good on vitamin D when tested despite survey results indicating people didn’t get enough from their diet generally. This was attributed to sun exposure

Then I looked it up and in many cases you get your full dose of vitamin D from the sun in literally a few minutes lol. Honestly I think the whole supplement industry in general is just a very successful scam

Edit: found it, section of note is vitamin d intakes and status.

evidence suggests that the majority of people have sufficient serum concentrations of vitamin D based on the thresholds set by the Food and Nutrition Board

If your doctor literally told you to take it then that’s great. The constant fear mongering among the general public about supplements is the scam

https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminD-HealthProfessional/

I go to hug my wife for comfort. She too is AI

To tell if it’s a big or small banana

Yeah solving it without following any method probably actually requires you to be a genius or something lol

I love the established speedcubing strategies tho, it basically changes it from being a puzzle you’re trying to solve into being similar to a rogue-like video game where you get a new “map” each time. Totally different skillset but also super rewarding in its own way

Presumably caused by people browsing on their blow-off-some-steam deck

Dead in 20 minutes tops

The fact we can see the kid at all is actually pretty impressive for american trucks

Almost a full kg of sugar if the display case had 48 bars

Did she ever come back around on you? If only we could explain things to them haha

I think unlisted means they just won’t appear in search/recommended, but can still be viewed if you link directly to them

Not sure what you mean? Search works today to find the setting that was screenshotted today, of this there can be no doubt, but I’m talking about two years from now when they rename it to “Unified Marketing” and relocate the setting to “Continuity”

Thank you! The following negativity isn’t directed at you in any way, because this is very helpful (for now).

But something that annoys me about apple is they like, move settings around constantly and change the names of settings. So if you’re having some issue, guides like this with specific detailed instructions end up outdated and lead to dead ends, and not even the search function helps. Almost every issue I have I end up having to look up a second guide on how to find the modern location for whatever toggle I need lol

We’ve come such a long way from beans

No it’s real. It’s basically just the ability to view the emails that were released by congress in the format of looking at the gmail website, including sorting by contact and stuff. Pretty cool

The statement of fact you hold in contention can be confirmed by any doubtful reader by numerous sources that appear in a quick web search

You are simply factually mistaken about the nature of herbivores generally. You are also, intentionally or not, engaging in equivocation between the concepts of what is nutritionally required to eat and what is biologically required to function further down the line. You are also engaged in an ongoing adjustment of your argument, apparently just for the sake of argument, without addressing the serious issues with your argument as it was originally presented.

For these reasons I’m not terribly interested in an ongoing dialogue with you on this topic. It’s simply not a productive use of my time to keep on reading large papers you link to but haven’t read yourself, then correcting the claims you make that the evidence you provide doesn’t support. I also do not feel any need to directly address the false claims you falsely accuse me of making, when my above posts already clearly contradict them. I trust that readers with a genuine interest will be able to navigate these posts without issue, and then delve into the textbooks worth of fully unsimplified research if it strikes their fancy to do so.

Have a good day