Yeah it is rather funny the more I read it. Like, just copy the article language or paraphrase it quickly. Reminds me of reading state ballot measures in the us.

Not just .world. I saw people from all over recommending matrix by element, and element works with the police and nato

I’m not even a tech knower and found that connection

It says:

She was the first South Korean director who was allowed to visit North Korea after Korean War without being charged for treason by South Korea, because she has a German passport. She gave up South Korean citizenship and took the German one just for making this documentary and getting a visa and the permission of shooting from North Korea

The phrasing is a bit odd, but the reference goes to a DW article, the subheading of which is:

A new film made by Sung-Hyung Cho attempts to give outsiders an insight into life in North Korea. The director, who even had to give up her South Korean nationality to shoot the film, spoke to DW about the project.

Well to be fair, the Dems are still somewhat pretending. Fewer people are buying it.

I was just being pedantic really sry

Have you looked into the “demonstrators” they clashed with? If not, you may find that particularly telling. You know how the usian media acts like every protest is a bloody clash where cops are being overwhelmed and murdered? Well, this was that, for real.

I support unarmed cops, and I support “clashing” with citizens who start killing them.

So you and I watch memento like, how is this interesting? Doesn’t everyone live like this?

Yeah, you’re right. You and other user must agree on terms and on what you already agree on first.

I saw they had a similar experience of talking past each other with cowbee. They might be a particularly articulate wrecker, but I didn’t want to jump straight there.

It’s not that you don’t belong, it’s that you engage in rhetorical strategies that are emotionally abusive while writing apologia for nazis.

It’s just the paradox of tolerance. If we tolerate Nazi apologia, that’s all the site will become (just like Twitter). If I were a mod, your comments defending musk’s Nazi salute would be deleted and you would be permanently banned, but I’m not a mod. So, I’m asking nicely.

But most of us still drive, I suppose that was the point

You, elsewhere in the thread

Rude

Yeah but you’re not just looking. You’re running your mouth. People tend to ask for clarifications.

Sometimes people sacrifice things for principles. What’s funny about that?

Shoehorning objectivation into every context may be simple, but answering the question of why we do that is not.

Please just go back to Reddit. You’re just here to try to wreck this community, and we all know it.

Why do you use the phrase “that’s my point” if you’re not trying to make one. You seem confused

What’s your point? People have to do things they hate? Why not develop that thought further? WHY do we have to, and is a world where we have to less often (or not at all) possible?

People who don’t have alternatives, yeah. Your thinking is too individualistic. You may agree on basic aversions, but the individualism is why you are getting downvotes

Fuck cars is indeed a prevailing sentiment here and elsewhere, as it should be.

“He takes the some of the liberal achievements (rationalism, the end of feudal bondage, and the Labor Theory of Value) and shows that they can only be fully realized by moving beyond the capitalist mode of production”

I thought that was pretty clear. The achievements are to be fully realized which cannot be done without overthrowing liberal democracy. The full realizations of achievements are mutually exclusive with the continued existence of libdem

That might not be what they meant though. That’s just how I read it.

Becoming? Those were always accusations in a mirror