All you gotta do is ask everyone to scoot down a room (or two, not sure if Sis and the boulder are looking to share a room) and you’ll find there’s plenty of room.
The problem with federation is there’s always that person who believes an article should be posted in 50 communities and then there’s no escaping it. I’m tired of seeing this article as I scroll.
My most recent complaint is about index mappings. I have 2 types in 2 different indexes that each have a field with the same name. One index has a hand written mapping. The other index is currently under active development and doesn’t have a mapping for it yet so it’s built automatically. When I insert into the index WITHOUT a mapping, the index WITH a mapping changes the field into a keyword and no further queries against the index WITH a mapping work. This also happens if I insert into the index WITHOUT a mapping before the other index is created. Why does the index WITH a mapping change?!? WE WROTE THE MAPPING FOR A REASON BUT ITS IGNORED!?!
ElasticSearch would make me drink if I drank
I wish more people knew about dtrx (Do The Right eXtraction).
I still blame Jeep for thinking a rotating selector was a good idea for a gear shifter. RIP Anton Yelchin.
I’m still not sure what that context is. I’m a year into Duolingo and they haven’t spelled that out for me in a way I understand yet.