• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlLibs on lemmy and their hot takes! 😂
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I am not defending US imperialism, just criticizing a double standard.

    Imperialism is a state seeking to maintain and/or extend power over other states. That is exactly what China is doing with Taiwan. Of course, unequal exchange is also a form of imperialism.

    Imperialism is when you have a civil war.

    That’s just wrong. What is true though is that civil wars more often than not are influenced by foreign powers trying to influence them to their own benefit.








  • Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    No, I just have very different ideas what progress is.

    Progress in my eyes is made when a society becomes more democratic, and when we solve conflicts without bloodshed.

    In that sense, sure, the GDR was a step in the right direction, but nazi germany didn’t exactly set the bar very high.

    The idea of socialism is nice, but you hardly have any progress if the system (be it built on free markets or planned economies) doesn’t work to improve ordinary citizens’ lives, but only to keep the powerful in power.

    Personaly, I don’t care much about free markets or planned economies. I think the best approach, as so often, is a kind of blend, a social market economy that allows independent companies in a framework that protects workers, consumers and the environment.

    Thing is, the specifics of the economic system aren’t important. What matters is that the people are the ones who decide them.

    There is nothing wrong with pursuing a utopian society, but ultimatly you have no control over what happens in the far future (neither should you, future societies need to be ruled by future people).

    The only thing you can control is the present and the near future, so what really matters aren’t the ends you strive for, but the means you employ while doing so.


  • Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ah yes, my grandparents, the landlords. Wait hol’ up, they were working people, not landlords. GDR fucked them regardless.

    “bUt tHAT wASn’T rEaL ComMunIsM” If neither the USSR nor China could achieve true Communism, then maybe it isn’t so much a realistic goal as a utopian ideal, a convenient justification for all kinds of crimes against humanity that occur in its pursuit.



  • Technological progress reduces the amount of work required to perform certain tasks. In any just system, this would improve the lives of the general population, either by reducing the amount of work required to make a living, or by increasing the amount and range of products and services.

    If technological progress does not do that, and instead makes the rich richer and the poor poorer, the problem isn’t technological progress, but the system in which it is applied.

    So what I’m saying is this: AI isn’t the problem. AI replacing employees isn’t the problem. The problem is that with a class divide into investors and workers, the ones profiting the most from technological progress are the investors.