You mean the guys who already own like 49% of "Open"AI?

I only take on gross work, as per rhyming conventions gross work is your gross worth.

Idk, it’s Google, so I think it’s more likely they just drop it entirely and start a new project with the same features…

Thanks Gemini, I hope they take a while before enshittefying you…

A chuldhood on 4chan has made me very uncomfortable when people start posting sinks…

I’m hoping even a junior dev has had more than 60 hours of training.

“And we would’ve gotten away with it too if it wasn’t for those meddling bloggers.”

Just in time for all the searchable information to be completely drowned out by low quality AI content.

As always, Australia is deeply conflicted on the issue.

Thanks, Doc

What do you use to mash them?

I’d say more than that. I don’t think anyone is that close to AGI…yet

A calculator does most of it too, but this is a LLM that can do lots of other things also, which is a big piece of the “general” part of AGI.

Richard Feynman said “You have to keep a dozen of your favorite problems constantly present in your mind, although by and large they will lay in a dormant state. Every time you hear or read a new trick or a new result, test it against each of your twelve problems to see whether it helps. Every once in a while there will be a hit, and people will say, “How did he do it? He must be a genius!”

We are close to a point where a computer that can hold all the problems in its “head” can test all of them against all of the tricks. I don’t know what math problems that starts to solve but I bet a few of them would be applicable to cryptology.

But then again, I have no idea what I’m talking about and just making bold guesses based on close to no information.

A legit ~50% reduction in the government based on a random metric with no thought given to consequence or if the government would even still function.

One might even call it “arbitrary and capricious.”

Of course there is zero way each of them will find that many people, let alone the levels below that. It’s a scam that benefits those higher up, and the ones lower will likely not receive anything.

And part of the scam is to tell people that there’s still time to be one of the early higher ups scamming other people!

And when asked about a potential release window for Haunted Chocolatier in 2024 or 2025, Barone smiled, “Still gonna be a while. I won’t say.”

All of their creativity goes into the mental gymnastics instead of something good or useful.

If ‘anybody’ does anything similar to tracing, copy&pasting or even sampling a fraction of another person’s imagery or written work, that anybody is violating copyright.

Ok, but tracing is literally a part of the human learning process. If you trace a work and sell it as your own that’s bad. If you trace a work to learn about the style and let that influence your future works that is what every artist already does.

The artistic process isn’t copyrighted, only the final result. The exact same standards can apply to AI generated work as already do to anything human generated.

I take it we don’t use the phrase “good writers borrow, great writers steal” in this day and age…

But you know Nestle wouldn’t. To them child slavery is like steroids on steroids.