Grabbed my ol man’s winch and made a flying fox with his one.
Grabbed my ol man’s winch and made a flying fox with his one.
Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
The ultimate question of philosophy…
“"Should I kill myself, or have a cup of coffee?”
-Camus
It’s like if 4chan and Quora had a baby.
Do you mean Jewish arabs? or Semitic Muslims maybe. Technically Semitic is a language group which includes arabic but like indo-european it can also refer to the people who originally used the dialect… bigotry fails at logic.
Straight up description of an entity thousands report seeing while on DMT tho.
Can’t sell your organs either… Well, not easily.
Audible is open about it. Well, if you dig through the fine print. Easy enough to rip copies but I’d say most people only realise they need to when they loose access. Maybe not, but $30 for an audiobook seems like pretty shity value if you’re only renting it untill you cancel your subscription.
E: I might be misinformed/ outdated.
Bravo.
Worked for books and Audible!
Some people say there’s a spooky skeleton inside you right now!
In Aus they do it on gravel with bunky utes. In UAE they do it on bitumen with new Mercs. Takes a bit of fine tuning but it’s the same same.
Why did 2 break up with zero?
Some 1 got between them!
Fun Pimps were a smaller company and they have been developing 7 Days since my gramps was in nappies!
Okay… And if you stand by your morals, more power to you. For me, it’s a worthwhile trade forfeiting my data (usually anonymised anyways) for the convenience of their free services.
I’m not ignorant. Any one who isn’t aware of where G’s revenue comes from has been living under a rock. The choice is clear, and if Google is making that even more obvious, I think that’s a good thing.
Keep fighting the good fight, but the majority of us will keep using google because these *exclusive scoops shouldn’t be a revelation to anyone.
Implying humans have souls.
Not a great way to start.
crimes he committed
citation needed
That’s my entire point. I made no claim about weighing up hypotheticals on an ethical scale.
As I said in another comment, for a legit high rolling financer (which he undoubtedly was to some extent) it’s not at all suspicious to see these people in the same room.
That’s… not relevant to my point at all.
Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.