I’ll bet the babies who eat around the box are the same ones who’d throw a fit if their parents didn’t cut the crust off their sandwiches.

I recommend starting with a low-FODMAP diet if you don’t want that kind of fermentation.

Also, buddy, no, you aren’t making “your own” logo; that piece of shit’s in the public domain by nature of how it was created.

“One of the things I like doing most is bangin’ hoors.”

If you use DuckDuckGo, you can just type !wt wordyouwant. This takes you to the English Wiktionary entry (EDIT: I forgot to mention this language depends on your DDG locale), where Wiktionary is a (really rich and underappreciated) sister project to Wikipedia that acts as an every-language-to-English dictionary (or e.g. an every-language-to-French dictionary in the case of fr.wiktionary.org, etc.)

As an example of the first random word that came to mind: concentric

Oh, no, I’m from Utica.

I make a mode dish, by which I mean I perfectly replicate a McDonald’s hamburger.

What is this fucking world 🍆💦ing to?

Sheesh, OP, watch your filthy fucking language.

Dude, that thing could be mistaken for my pinkie or for his erect penis.

I mean it’s one banana, Michael.

To elaborate on what’s already common knowledge, feeding bread to birds is a fucking terrible idea in every way. Nobody wins except potentially some algae that gets some new kids, a mold that gets a lovely new home in a respiratory tract, or a fox that gets easy prey unable to fly.

No, no, you can clearly see “PETA” inscribed on his pants, and he’s here to tell Elmo about the animal abuse in his glass and his bread.

Here’s Budgie’s blog post about it.

The AI slop version is kind of cursed given the first of a shrimp’s five pairs of legs is a set of chelipeds – namely legs bearing (smol) claws like in crabs, lobsters, etc.

TL;DR it’s wearing jeans over its arms.

> Only three pairs of pants

Someone is not a real shrimp fan. Should be four. (Chelipeds obviously aren’t covered.)

> Claims to be Fox News

> Covers news about rats instead

Relevant video from The Onion.

Oh, you’ll love it. The part where they visit his whomb and find it empty… 🤌

The Whocifixion after he was betrayed by Whodas.

Well, was the dad wrong?

I mean use of the CLI on Linux generally. I used “terminal” vaguely because the original comment used it vaguely. “Down pat” is to say that I’m perfectly comfortable with it, namely that the course taught me:

• How to execute programs from the shell (and interrupt execution/kill processes).
• How to navigate and alter the filesystem, search for files and their contents, etc.
• How to install, remove, and configure software.
• How to set aliases.
• How to write shell scripts.
• How to edit files (although 99% of the time this is useless; I’ll just use something like Kate instead).
• How to parse and interpret program output.
• How to read man pages.
• Generally how to do anything I couldn’t/wouldn’t prefer to do from a GUI instead.

I use the shell vastly more than 99.99% of people and haven’t had a problem with or changed how I interact with it since that course; that to me is “down pat” for the terminal itself. I don’t care if I don’t know every application and flag ever made, because that’s not the point – like knowing how to use a GUI doesn’t mean you’ve memorized all GUI software, just that you know how to interpret the design language of and successfully use new GUI software. If I need to do something my current tools can’t, I can just search for the right program and use the man page to quickly write a command.

Meanwhile, with something like LibreOffice Calc, which I understand is much less feature-rich than the industry standard Excel, I don’t just learn about new functions like CORREL(), akin to what I said before about learning new CLI applications; I fundamentally learn how to create and edit spreadsheets more quickly. In Impress, I still learn how to make presentations more appealing, more readable, etc. Basically things that aren’t just rote memorization of gadgets that I could look up at any time. That’s what sets it apart to me – the fact that anything I don’t already know about the Linux terminal is present in readily available reference material and better off not memorized.