The ironic twist there is that insurance companies here should have good legal teams to go after someone else to cover it.

good luck with getting the PT covered!

This is actually where Twitter was good. I would always get a better response with a public @ mention to the company on Twitter.

But the bank would care about the police report for the charge back. A civil court would care about it if having to sue for restitution if the charge back is denied.

For PDF is does splitting and merging and rotating pages.

They put a shit ton of money into state races, too. Their plan was to get enough state legislatures in their pocket to call a constitutional convention and rewrite the US as an anarcho-capitalist state.

Right. The sentence I quoted was kind of wedged in with the reporting on what you’re stating. So it seemed like associating the two, and I didnt really see the direct private sale as something to have lumped in (to report on as something nefarious).

Honestly regulating businesses to ensure fair and ethical competition and trade is something I like my tax dollars being spent on.

I know you weren’t replying to me, but … what?

I don’t doubt it, and I 100% support regulations aimed at increasing wealth and ownership opportunity and equality. If Compass is shown to be discriminating against minorities, then yeah prosecute the fuck out of them. I just think forcing people to list their home even though they already have a buyer selected isn’t really going to do anything about it and just artificially raises the sale price to cover the realtor fees. Say some elderly home owner is nearing hospice or something and wants to sell the house to their grandkid who is starting a family. Why should they have to do anything other than get a mortgage approved and go sign all the deed/title paperwork for the bank and the county? Forcing it to be listed isn’t going to suddenly make that home be an option for a discriminated minority buyer, because the buyer has already been selected by the owner.

No, dude. Redlining is about banks not lending to people in a discriminatory fashion. The first sentence in your link:

Redlining is a discriminatory practice in which financial services are withheld from neighborhoods that have significant numbers of racial and ethnic minorities.

I quoted a line specifically about the home owner (a person, not a bank or a coporation) having a specific buyer in mind. Not at all the same thing. Even if the owner lists it publicly, the owner still decides to whom they sell the property. Otherwise you would have property-holding companies out there suing to force the sale to them as the highest cash bidder. Forcing a public MLS listing is regulatory capture forcing buyers and sellers to pay a commission to a middle-man when there didn’t need to be one.

HOAs can fuck off and so can you.

Some homeowners want to sell to a neighbor or family member without broad advertising

So? Why should they need to broadly advertise it? It’s a private property transaction. It’s not like it’s government public property.

How do sovereign citizen and tankie go together?

I gave of MacOS when an OS update included a firmware rollback which disabled gigabit Ethernet on the NIC. So the Fedora install.may have updated the firmware or changed a firmware setting.

head straight for RISC V

I tip my hat to you.

An Herculean effort, even.

Ben Affleck and Thomas Jane are wanted for questioning.

Yes, it’s exactly what you’re thinking. Just like Laura Ingraham in 2016

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/07/laura-ingrahams-nazi-salute-examined.html

https://linux.die.net/man/1/wipe

https://dban.org/