The wikipedia definition doesn’t seem to agree with what you’re saying.
The wikipedia definition doesn’t seem to agree with what you’re saying.
It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.
When you ban people disagreeing with you, you’re not making anyone feel safer, you’re just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard
When you ban people by stating they’re transphobic when they’re not, you’re being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you’re with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.
When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.
But maybe it’s just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation
Income inequalities don’t implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people
Anarchism mainly rejects the state’s hierarchy. It doesn’t make it left or right
Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules
both are often linked
Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me
blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn’t mean they’re not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.
!196@lemmy.world doesn’t exist for no reason
for db0 it might be as frankly I don’t know, it was just a feeling that I have, that they’re more open towards liberalism
But for blahaj, up left seems like the correct spot
Woke, pro freedom of gender/identity, progressive; so most of the time left
Authoritarian, huge voice, strict on voicing their opinions and rules on the subject. You either agree or you’re banned. So authoritarian
I don’t know this one, worth checking out?
So you’re at the bottom 🤔, but where on the horizontal axis is to be guessed
blahaj up left
I have the feeling that db0 is down right
That’s a super shitty thing to do
He’s basically cheating and stealing from 35 people
I feel so bad for it
USA cops: let’s skip all 4 🙃
Now let’s create drama
Let’s do the same for lemmy instances 👀
Unrelated but your instance is sexy
People being publicly religious will always cringe me, just like people believing in astrology and posting about it
❤️
I experienced something kind of similar I guess. When I learned about this I was excited, but even though everything seems fine, there’s still this part of me that is like “what if I’m forgetting or fucking up something? I don’t want to lose my money, that’s a lot”
It’s all about balance ⚖️
It’s safer. This is a huge % of my life savings were talking about. I don’t trust myself to do it.
I can understand it, and respect your decision. At that point when we’re talking about such amounts, it’s better to offload this mental stress to a reputable company, even if it means a bit lower interest rates
The main thing to get out of this is that you’re investing and frankly, it’s pretty much all that matter
I still fail to see how anarchism inherently wants to make salaries and income more even
That’s an extension that belongs to a branch of anarchism, it is not supposed to be like this by definition