This is damn great.
- 0 Posts
- 50 Comments
sndrtj@feddit.nlto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•This ad that says “Wake up! A beach house is not a dream.”English1·2 years agoInsanely vile.
If your own instance doesn’t federate with NSFW instances, you won’t see any.
But indigestion is sort of the opposite of diarrhea?
sndrtj@feddit.nlto Sync for Lemmy@lemmy.world•Sync incredibly slow to load pages since lemm.ee upgraded to 19English1·2 years agoSame on feddit.nl
But dandelion greens are actually edible. Reed has no edible parts.
I can’t unsee this is 🤣🤣
I’m a backend dev. I needed basically a single js function for my personal website that called out to some NPM package. I thought: I’ll do this the proper modern way, typescript and everything. Result: under 10 lines of code, but 12 config files (and 1.5h of fiddling with ES Modules vs CommonJS).
sndrtj@feddit.nlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Relative size comparison of social media platforms (December 2023)English4·2 years agoSnap is still alive? I haven’t heard name in quite a while.
a.unwrap_or(b)
You don’t have to feel bad for cutting grass. That’s grass its entire evolutionary skitch, albeit naturally with being grazed instead of mechanically cut.
Grass survives cuts extremely well. Most of its mass is below ground. By thriving in areas that are frequently grazed / cut, it outcompetes other plants. Natural meadows without grazers quickly turn into forests. But tree saplings don’t survive being eaten, so whenever there are grazers (or human cuts), grass outcompetes trees.
Oh wow lol.
Wait what? Link?
sndrtj@feddit.nlto Sync for Lemmy@lemmy.world•Does this thumbnail/image flip for anyone else when viewing?English16·2 years agoSame thing happens to me. Wild.
This was a seriously good shitpost. Had me for a second.
Statistics would indicate that that is a plausible scenario.
In addition, a uniparental disomy can occur as well. Here, the X chromosome was duplicated in the egg cell. So the exact same X chromosome is inherited twice.This is an error in meiosis. This could occur in XXX (with the third X from the father’s side), XXY, or even XX. That latter one would be rare, for a uniparental disomy on X without a third sex chromosome would mean both egg and sperm cell had an error during meiosis.
You could also see a single X (Turner Syndrome) as a 100% dominant X-chromosome. But that may be semantics.
X-inactivation is a little bit more complicated than that. While the process of X-inactivation initiation is random, once a cell has settled on one chromosome, all its daughter cells will silence the same chromosome. The initial process happens in the early embryo, so large patches of the body have the same X chromosome silenced.
This pattern is visible in some animals. E.g. a tortoise cat’s pattern arises due to the hair color gene existing on the X chromosome. Consequently, male tortoise cats are rare (XXY, XXXY etc only)
Oh it hurts how many of these are recognizable.
Everyone who has ever consumed dihydrogenmonoxide will die!
Sync filters a lot in client.