- 1 Post
- 15 Comments
trachemys@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy.World Announcements@lemmy.world•Alternative UI: PhotonEnglish
7·2 years agoI like that photon doesn’t use the user’s display name in place of just the user name. That’s an annoying twitter-like feature.
I enjoyed asking Microsoft, I mean Bing, how to install Linux from scratch. It is actually really helpful and even expressed hope that I would “enjoy the process and learn from it.”
(i use arch, btw)
trachemys@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Oracle: Keep Linux Open and Free—We Can’t Afford Not ToEnglish
144·3 years agoCheering for Oracle is certainly an unexpected turn of events, but here we are. They are absolutely right that
RedHatIBM’s motivations are simply to kill competition and obtain vendor lock-in by ending RHEL compatibility. RedHat is truly dead.
trachemys@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.ml•Sarah Silverman Sues Maker Of ChatGPT For Copyright Infringement
142·3 years agoWe are overdue for strengthening fair use.
trachemys@lemmy.worldto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Your Lemmy activities (e.g. downvotes) are far from privateEnglish
52·3 years agoAll the more reason to keep a different alt for each area of interest.
trachemys@lemmy.worldOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Looks like bing chat is programmed to insist that RedHat RHEL is not violating the GPL…English
1·3 years agoI agree that all that can be done is sue them and lets the courts decide what the meaning of the GPL contract is.
I’m surprised at the link you gave since it is written by someone who agrees with my take, not yours and RedHat’s. And you stated clearly that RedHat absolutely is not violating the GPL, when that is actually just your opinion. The real tldr quote of that article is:
Debates continue, even today, in copyleft expert circles, whether this model itself violates GPL. There is, however, no doubt that this provision is not in the spirit of the GPL agreements.
Time for a GPL version 4: no extraneous agreements that nullify GPL terms.
My apologies if I seem too hostile.
trachemys@lemmy.worldOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Looks like bing chat is programmed to insist that RedHat RHEL is not violating the GPL…English
01·3 years agoassuming Red Hat finds out
If RedHat is serious, they can put watermarking/stenography on the code they give you. Might not be proof in court, but enough to figure you are the leaker.
trachemys@lemmy.worldOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Looks like bing chat is programmed to insist that RedHat RHEL is not violating the GPL…English
0·3 years agoIf you deny redistribution, you are violating GPL. Do you agree with that?
So the question is then, does telling someone to promise not to do something, and punishing them if they do, violate there right to it?
trachemys@lemmy.worldOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Looks like bing chat is programmed to insist that RedHat RHEL is not violating the GPL…English
01·3 years agoThat is just denying redistribution with extra steps.
trachemys@lemmy.worldOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Looks like bing chat is programmed to insist that RedHat RHEL is not violating the GPL…English
09·3 years agoIf Microsoft is using its bot to push an agenda, that is worth talking about. You won’t be able to convince everyone to not listen to bots.
The yank buffer is useful, but sometimes I’ll do an action that replaces the yank buffer, when I wanted to save that text. So put:
map K “_in your .vimrc. Now you can use shift-k before a command to make it not update the yank buffer. For example: go to a word and type yw to copy the word. Go to another word and type KdwP to delete the word and paste your saved word. Alternately, you can also type Kcw then type something and ctrl-R followed by “ to paste.
trachemys@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy.World Announcements@lemmy.world•I feel like there is a pending wave of AI bots incomingEnglish
2·3 years agoActivityPub is not software but is a open standard published by W3C, just like HTTP. Lemmy server software is AGPL3, which is GPL3 for network software.


Why can’t Deadpool comic artist Rob Liefeld draw feet?