Just this guy, you know?

  • 0 Posts
  • 109 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • zaphod@lemmy.catoGaming@beehaw.orgLet's discuss: Mass Effect
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s all about tone. The original comment was incredibly combative and hyperbolic (“I utterly loathe Mass Effect. I consider it one of the worst pieces of science-fiction ever created.”) so much so that it would easily be mistaken for flamebait given the thread was likely to attract fans of the series.

    It certainly didn’t strike me as the start of an open-minded conversation.

    But in hindsight I should’ve just downvoted and moved on rather than commenting as I did, so that’s on me.



  • zaphod@lemmy.catoGaming@beehaw.orgLet's discuss: Mass Effect
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Ahh yes, the old “sticks and stones” defense that completely ignores human nature and basic decency. I use the same logic when I tell other people their babies are ugly. “Look, if you ask me your kid is an eyesore but it’s just my opinion so I don’t know why you’re so mad right now…”












  • zaphod@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldPlease Stop
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You didn’t actually read the page you linked to, did you?

    Let’s just jump to the conclusion:

    This author believes it is technologically indefensible to call Fossil a “blockchain” in any sense likely to be understood by a majority of those you’re communicating with. Using a term in a nonstandard way just because you can defend it means you’ve failed any goal that requires clear communication. The people you’re communicating your ideas to must have the same concept of the terms you use.

    (Emphasis mine)

    Hint: a blockchain is always a Merkel tree, but a Merkel tree is not always a blockchain.


  • zaphod@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldPlease Stop
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    the technology itself has its use cases.

    Cool.

    Name one successful example.

    I mean, it’s been, what, 15 years of hype? Surely there must be a successful deployment of a commercially viable and useful blockchain that isn’t just a speculative cryptocurrency or derivative thereof, right?

    Right?



  • zaphod@lemmy.catolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldOld is stability
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yes I’m aware of the security tradeoffs with testing, which is why I’ve started refraining from mentioning it as an option as pedants like to pop out of the woodwork and mention this exact issue every damn time.

    Also, testing absolutely gets “security support”, the issue is that security fixes don’t land in testing immediately and so there can be some delay. As per the FAQ:

    Security for testing benefits from the security efforts of the entire project for unstable. However, there is a minimum two-day migration delay, and sometimes security fixes can be held up by transitions. The Security Team helps to move along those transitions holding back important security uploads, but this is not always possible and delays may occur.



  • zaphod@lemmy.catolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldOld is stability
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    For the target users of Debian stable? No.

    Debian stable is for servers or other applications where security and predictability are paramount. For that application I absolutely do not want a lot package churn. Quite the opposite.

    Meanwhile Sid provides a rolling release experience that in practice is every bit as stable as any other rolling release distro.

    And if I have something running stable and I really need to pull in the latest of something, I can always mix and match.

    What makes Debian unique is that it offers a spectrum of options for different use cases and then lets me choose.

    If you don’t want that, fine, don’t use Debian. But for a lot of us, we choose Debian because of how it’s managed, not in spite of it.