0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pubimagemessage-square258fedilinkarrow-up11.35Karrow-down136
arrow-up11.31Karrow-down1imageSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pub0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square258fedilink
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up26·2 years agoAnarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
minus-squareaksdb@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoSo we could use a blockchain… (/s)
minus-squaremcmoor@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·2 years agoBut then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoWhich is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.
Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
Basicaly democracy on steroids
So we could use a blockchain… (/s)
But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
You can have a majority vote system.
Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.