An oldie, but a goodie

  • crackajack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can be angry without being rude. I’d much prefer passive aggressiveness than egregious blame-shifting and accusations.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being directly a cunt actually causes sabotaging employees who work the minimum letter of the contract until they can quit via a text 5 minutes after start of day because they got another job lined up.

        Dumb managers poison the well by acting like this.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you can’t express yourself without expletives, it just means you have a small vocabulary or lack the maturity to express yourself without getting emotional, or both. It is a major sign of incompetence, unprofessionalism, and ignorance.

        Direct != being an asshole. If you don’t understand that, you have a lot to learn.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t need to be passive agressive either, you can just be polite and factual.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s a hard pass on passive aggressiveness, constructive criticism isn’t either of those things nor rude and angry ranting. Love Linus, but he really did need to chill out a bit more with these things. He could have gotten the same point across without coming across as yelling at the guy, just firmly pointing out that it was caused by the patch, the patch did things it shouldn’t ever do, and don’t break userspace or blame userspace programs