• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some percentage of revenue for using other people’s IP is pretty normal.

      And I think it’s hard to argue Baldur’s Gate and using DnD isn’t a meaningful part of its success. Divinity Original Sin 2 is a really good game with a lot of the same DNA (it’s why I personally bought BG3), and it stayed pretty niche. The IP is a big part of it exploding.

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d argue it had far more to do with it being another one of Larian’s RPGs with significantly more production value.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re underselling how massive the Baldur’s Gate name is.

          The exact same production in DOS3 wouldn’t have near the same runaway hype train.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would agree that it being DnD was part of its success but I still don’t think Hasbro deserves 90m for it

        • Breezy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But they got a percentage, would you have been happier if they only got ten million but a lot leas people bought the game? Idk what deal they had, however the game was great and a lot of people loved it. And so hasbro got a lot of money, this will hopefully encourage them to lease out more IPs.