• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    xkcd 927 in action right there.

    Zigbee works just fine, but needs a hub to share out devices eg internet access or HomeKit. But it is quick. How thread compares remains to be seen.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Remains to be seen? What other information are you waiting for?

      I’ve been using Thread devices for ~5 years now.

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I haven’t started with home automation yet.

        How’s product availability for thread bulbs and motion sensors? Expensive? Works with HA?

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Thread is just as efficient based on the few battery operated motion sensors I have. That’s another reason Matter over Thread is better than Matter over WiFi.

          I personally won’t buy another IoT device unless it’s Matter over Thread.

          With that said, if you already use home assistant, and what you have works well enough. I wouldn’t rush to upgrade. But I would choose Matter + Thread over older technologies moving forward.

          If you want to move to all HomeKit, then the upgrades are worth it.

          In an ideal future world, Matter + Thread devices won’t need a vendor app to work. They just connect to your Amazon Voice assistant, or your Google Home, or your Apple HomeKit setup directly. (Or Home Assistant)

          In the future we should see more vendors selling Matter compatible devices that don’t even offer an app. But this is down the road.

          • So Thread is a low-power radio, and Matter is the protocol? Does it is the same frequency ranges - 2.4 and 5 GHz? Or does it have a different spectrum? One of the reasons I chose zwave initially was because the standard allows far more devices in the spectrum than ZigBee, and WiFi crowding is already an issue with only all of the phones, tablets, computers, and devices that I couldn’t get in zwave.

            • paraphrand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              It’s still 2.4, but it meshes and extends itself with more devices.

              If you have an exceptionally bad RF environment, maybe you will have issues.

              But keep in mind that IOT devices are not usually broadcasting in the way WiFi is. The impact of 10 Thread devices is not the same as 10 old school 802.11 devices.

              Thread is still better than 2.4ghz WiFi for IOT, and I would say this is true for the vast majority of people. But maybe there is a small percentage who have such an intense RF situation that they will need a different spectrum. But really, it sounds like you are possibly either an outlier, or are misunderstanding the shape of the situation. Lamenting that a phone or tablet can’t use zwave for networking is really strange.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Thread is basically the same thing, but with a different upper level layer (IP), lower lever is still 802.15.4