• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Gold actually is worthless but humanity has decided it has value. Whats actually valuable is food, water, housing, mental peace, low stress, moral standards etc.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Gold is an extremely useful metal, WTF are you talking about? Despite its artificially high cost, it still gets regularly used in industrial applications. If it had a more reasonable price, it would be used a ton

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Gold is a actually extremely useful, and has a ton of practical applications where it’s not used because of cost. Diamonds, which are supposedly abundant in asteroids, and quite plentiful on earth, on the other hand, can be manufactured in tool grade cheaply, and gem grade can be made for about $300/carat.

      • Nikelui@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It was also used in medical implants, since it’s a pretty inert material ( was, because nowadays there are better biocompatible materials).

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s more silly to me that they think the price of gold would remain high with such a large addition to supply. Most fundamental economic concept apparently escapes some people

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      If anything, it seems like an opportunity for billionaires to have indentured servants who are stuck in outer space mining until their term is up. That’s probably some of the reason they have been investing so heavily in prisons.

        • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          You may think that you are scared. But you are not. That is your sharpness. That’s your power. We are Belters. Nothing in the world is foreign to us. The place we go is the place we belong. This is no different. No one has more right to this. None more prepared. Inulada go through the ring. Call it there own. But a Belter opened it. We are The Belt. We are strong. We are sharp and we don’t feel fear. This moment belongs to us. For Beltalowada!

    • Inucune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Given none of the supply chain and infrastructure to support mining and retrieval exists, it would need to be researched and constructed. That money would be invested in the market and flood down for tooling, manufacturing and manpower.

      Once you have the rock, you’ll need to process it into usable materials.

      Low price gold flooding the market may be bad short term, but there are processes that will benefit from cheap gold in manufacturing. The market will stabilize.

      It is more than just magicing the rock to someone’s bank account in liquid currency. There is a lot of money they will have to put in up front before they would see a financial return.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        In today’s age they’ll fill 95% of that supply chain with robots and automation. Even if it’s 40% less effective at retrieving the material, that will still probably result in better overall profit margins.

        The one thing capitalism has proven to be excellent at innovating is wealth extraction. Giving more to one person in every way possible. By the time we have this infrastructure built blue collar workers will be largely redundant.

        It happened to my industry (broadcast television)

        It happened to my father’s industry (animation)

        It happened to my step father’s industry (biotech)

        It happened to my brother’s industry (manufacturing)

        My sister and brother in law just saw their industries stop receiving funding (librarian and environmental scientist)

        Don’t count on new fields creating news jobs anymore. That’s the way of the old world.

        Whatever benefits having more gold would bring will only be given to the ultra wealthy who control that gold. Even if it brings the cost of phones down by 15% it won’t make a difference in how much the average person struggles. In fact, the resources consumed in retrieving and processing the gold will probably end up hurting most of our cost of living.

        We need to work on our social sciences before any other science can bring anyone real benefit anymore…

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          We need to work on our social sciences before any other science can bring anyone real benefit anymore…

          Well said. I have associate degrees only in Bio/Chem, and I was going to keep going but… why? To work for an evil pharmaceutical company? To work in the shitty corporate cannabis industry? To advise rich assholes on how to cut down our national forests in a way which makes it appear like it’s not the end of the world?

          The only STEM career I’ve found which seems guaranteed to be ethical is the people who do wildlife surveys, finding endangered bees and whatnot to block bullshit luxury real estate. But going through all that education to aim for a single, specific, probably-not-very-common position doesn’t seem very smart.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And where do you think the majority of the wealth is going to be concentrated? Or do you think everyone on Earth will magically become a billionaire?

  • Nziom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hope palladium and other PGM become worthless so catalyst converters are ok to own

  • gnutrino@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    More likely - whichever billionaire mined it (well, funded the mining anyway) would hoard it off the market to keep the value high and make them richer.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      You fool, the tax payers will fund it. The billionaire will merely provide the shell companies to channel government funding through, in return for some sizeable dark money political donation kickbacks that will enable whatever crooked politicians who allowed such theft to occur to absolutely flood the airwaves with propaganda at every election cycle.

    • vapordays@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      “The mine owners did not find the gold asteroid, they did not mine the gold asteroid, they did not mill the gold asteroid, but by some weird alchemy all the gold from the asteroid belonged to them!”

      Bill Haywood

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Being rich means having a surplus of valuable commodities and capital.

      In a modern capitalist system, the commodities are fetishized in order to inflate their received value.

      But in a more socialized system, shared capital has the capacity to enrich everyone.

      The big catch is that, under a more socialist economy existing in parallel with a capitalist media, poverty becomes associated with the public institutions while capitalism becomes indicative of education, independence, and success.

      An individual might be wealthy with respect to historical peers under a socialist model, but still feel improvised relative to the elites and their horded private wealth. That they’ve got access to libraries and parks and subways and public housing doesn’t feel like wealth relative to the country clubbers who have more grandeous private versions of all of the above.

      You’ll see this in Western depictions of Soviet states all the time. Small apartments, bread lines, and grumpy bureaucrats are slanted as rampant poverty. Meanwhile, homelessness and malnutrition and the lawless frontier are all just part of the Hero’s Journey on the way to glory.

  • Dryad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, that would make a few people incomprehensible wealthy while everyone else starved.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any way you slice it gold would be less-valuable.

      Asteroid mining is good for resource gathering, not accumulation of wealth. And even then it’s much more useful for resource gathering for use in space than on Earth. If you can launch once, then mine, process, and use the resources without having to do more launches and landings it’s much more efficient. Then you’d start manufacturing in space to further reduce the amount of required launches.

    • RosaLuxemburgsGhost@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It all depends on property rights and ownership. If few people hoard and control all of the resources and means of production that make the resources like gold valuable, they will continue to profit. Everyone else’s standard of living will continue to plummet in their efforts to control more markets (through wars, embargoes, trade agreements, etc.) and squeeze out the greatest amount of profits from everything and everyone.

      Until property relations change, the property-less (and I don’t mean a single family homes….i mean machines and resources that create wealth) will continue to struggle to greater and greater degrees across the world.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    3 days ago

    At least everything would be covered in gold then. Electronics would be cheaper too.

        • snoons@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          With gold bullets and a gold guillotine. I think they would like that.

          • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Gold plated isn’t actually hard I think I could to that in my bathtub but would it hold an edge?

            • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Maybe the blade would have to be replaced on every use, but the weight would still do its job.

              … actually, maybe the blade wouldn’t even need to be replaced.

              • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I’ll believe you I don’t kn9w about this stuff I think I sharpened a kitchen knife once and my dad was making me he said I did a bad job and I tried to use that knife later I think he was being too nice

    • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      yeah, after impact, quite evenly. last time it happened, it was called iridium anomaly. there’s not that much gold in electronics and other platinum group metals are more useful from material engineering perspective

          • Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            No. If it were as cheap as steel, we wound make whole packages from it. Completely new things. We already use thicker and more gold plating where the cost is not as much of a factor, like space, medical and military stuff.

            • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              i think of gold more as a premium lead. we’d for sure coat insides of cans with it, instead of tin if it was so cheap, but it’s weaker than steel. radiation shielding would be another one, ever heard of ancient lead used for radiation shielding for high sensitivity experiments? gold has none of these problems. gold ammunition, gold piping for chemical industry instead of nickel alloys, as long as it’s not too heavy. it would also cause all sorts of new problems with recycling

        • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          yes for corrosion resistance and ductility. no for hardness, electrical and heat conductivity. you can’t use gold or its compounds as catalysts where copper makes sense

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not shit, it’s top 3 behind silver and copper. But those oxidize and gold doesn’t. So a gold coated silver core is what you want.

            • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              or you can use slightly thicker copper. but sometimes you can’t, and that’s when silver is a slight upgrade

              i heard that microwave parts for satellite use are made this way: first you start with aluminum, for structural and weight reasons. then it’s plated on inside (where microwaves are) with thin layer of zinc, then with copper. you can’t plate copper on aluminum directly. copper is there to conduct microwave current, but silver is slightly better, so there’s a layer of silver to conduct most of it, and copper handles the rest. then it’s topped with gold, and normally there’s a layer of nickel between copper and gold, but it’s a big nope for microwaves, and silver is alternative. it’s a very thin layer, so thin that it doesn’t conduct a lot of current, it’s there only for corrosion resistance

            • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Gold coating for connectors is nice. For everything else it doesn’t really matter, you get an oxide layer that prevents further oxidation.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gold price would lower until it’s the same price as it costs to mine and bring it to earth, if that’s at all lower than whatever it’s currently.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    The biggest value of this meteor is not gold it’s iridium and ironically it’s what we need to explore more other planets because iridium melting point is way higher. Also high precision electronics needs it

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Great movie. I have a lot of friends in scientific community, I swear all of them have had a #dontlookup moment in their life

  • AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gold is already worthless, main purpose of gold is that its shiny and pretty, less than 1% of gold mined gets used for electronics and stuff. The rest ist accessoires. The only reason gold costs something is because people think that it is worth something.

    • RainbowBlite@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      Gold does have practical value. It doesn’t oxidize or tarnish at standard temperature and pressure, it is soft enough to beat into shape with a hammer and it can be rolled out incredibly thinly. If it were as common as iron, we would see it used everywhere. Gold sewer pipes, gold roofing, even gold foil to wrap your sandwich.

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        A lot of people live their entire lives only being shiny and pretty and have a pretty good go of it.

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, and you’re making my mental gears turn. The only reason gold is worth something is because some regulatory power says it’s worth something. As soon as they say it’s not worth something that will be the end. As for now, some thieves go to Costco with stolen credit cards and they buy thousands of dollars of gold bars to resell. 😡 For that and many other reasons, I think gold should be demoted to the worth of arid dirt.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gold is more useful than copper or silver. If there were enough of it, it would be used as a coating because it doesn’t oxidize, and in connectors and wiring due to it’s low electrical resistance. It’s commercial value is the reason it became the monetary standard.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gold is a valuable catalyst in chemical industry, and has value as a very efficient conductor that is very malleable and corrosion resistant. Sure, most of its market value comes from people wanting to put it in jewellery and other decorations, but it’s objectively far, far, more valuable than most other materials.

  • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    enought to make everyone on earth billionaires

    How very thoughtful. Hope the present billionaires dont accidentally hoard it.