• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    327
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    “Our spyware is not able to accommodate your platform.”

    The horror stories I’ve read about what you give the software access to do (assuming there’s truth to them; I’ve never run it myself).

    Edit: I’m realizing now your screenshot is probably for a web course.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      150
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      It’s hilarious how bad it is

      I won’t ramble but I’m a cybersecurity professional with a lot of certs and… I’ve played with it (Pearson VUE)

      Hey Pearson, I have completely defeated your anticheat measures. Ironically, have used my expertise to pass cybersecurity exams. Fight me.

      Hey OP, use a free windows VM. Guess how many monitors your VM has? Guess how many your host can have? Yeah.

      This was 2019, so they may have gotten past that but I tells ya… For folks testing cybersec pros, they sure don’t have airtight opsec.

      I found more, but cannot responsibly disclose 😊

        • Alaik@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Most money moves because a retarded manager/executive has a retarded idea, I’m sure of it.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 days ago

        This is why I just suck it up and go to a testing center even though more often than not it’s unpleasant too. I’m not installing all their tools and having to clear an entire room so there’s nothing that can be seen is such a hassle.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Upgrayedd. With two “d”'s. For a double-dose of telemetry.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Aw, manggg. But I just upgraded to Linux last week. Shoot…

      Back to being treated like an idiot, force fed bloat, having no control over my own PC, and taking four steps to get everything done but often ending up down a rabbit hole of 19 step troubleshooting just to say, “Fuck it! Fine! I’ll accept the new feature” then being toured on the new feature after it crashes first then won’t let you login, but finally you do and THEN you’ve got your file open but forget what for by then, all the while it’s notifying you of updates constantly but you won’t run them because you noticed it contains the AMD driver which is the old one so Adrenaline will stop working but that also means Windows has somehow undone the group policy fucking around you had to do. And they say Linux is hard while Windows thinks I’m the fucking idiot and I CANT EVEN SHRINK THE FUCKING PARTITION BECAUSE THE GOD DAMNED PAGE FILE IS JIZZED ALL OVER THE FUCKING DRIVE!!! RAAARRRGH!!!

      snaps back

      Huh, sorry. I get flashbacks still. The doctors say with the right therapy, I’ll be better in a year.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      This means they forgot platforms other than Windows exists. It’s likely they’re checking for currently supported systems and anything older is insecure, so blocked for your security.

      Likely something like this pseudocode

      function isPlatformVersionSupported(useragent) {
          // Windows XP is NT 5.1
          // Windows Vista is NT 6.0
          // Windows 7 is NT 6.1
          // Windows 8 is NT 6.2
          // Windows 8.1 is NT 6.3
          // Windows 10 and 11 is NT 10.0
          if (useragent.name == "Windows" && useragent.version.match(/Windows NT (6\.3|10)/)) {
              return true
          }
      
          // TODO: insert supported macos versions here
      
          return false
      }
      
  • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    9 days ago

    Their deliberate word choice of “upgrade” to supported operating system is mildly infuriating.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          8 days ago

          Right, but that could still be given dynamically by a library as “one of the unsupported ones”, getOSName(). They still might not have hard-coded “Linux is bad”.

        • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          9 days ago

          Which will be “If not Windows 11 or Mac os then report os string”. I don’t think they specifically took the time to research different OS’s and list them.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          The program has the information, but that doesn’t mean the people that wrote the code felt it was worth their time to make the “upgrade” text inclusive to Linux, if they even considered the possibility of Linux.

        • Littux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          If they were using user agents for identification, Android browsers on “Desktop mode” would be wrongly identified as “Linux”. Even Discord has this issue on their download page. “Premium” Android devices with large screens use Desktop mode by default

  • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’ll just change my web browser’s user agent then; you’re a fucking website, you don’t need to know which OS I’m using.

    It’s amazing how many “unsupported” web apps work perfectly fine once you change the UA. It’s often a completely arbitrary limitation so that they can hire less qualified support staff.

      • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 days ago

        Nope we don’t want to hire anyone who knows anything about Linux, no one uses Linux

        “Linux is unsupported”, that’ll work

        Everyone: uses a UA switcher

        “See? No one uses Linux, 100% of users are on Windows or MacOS”

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      A small publisher’s ebook platform recently started blocking firefox for me, did a bit of digging and found that if pages aren’t requested with the right headers (which work in chrome and msedge) it will respond with a 302, suggesting you go to another page which takes a few minutes and then times out.

      This is probably to stop scraping, and could be because I started testing some scraping scripts on it.

      Anyway, this hasn’t even stopped me scraping, I just copied the headers and use those in my script.

  • Disorder6069@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I ran into this before too, I believe I got around it with a User Agent changer… that or a windows 10 VM with 2 cores and 2GB of RAM that ran only Firefox… or you may be able to just press remind me later and suffer little/no consequences

    I think it’s just because people that use Linux are generally more technologically inclined and are more likely to try and get around their crappy DRM

  • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    9 days ago

    How tf do you not support an operating system. Like you gotta go out of your way to detect and block the operating system. Like if you put in 0 effort it would probably work but your company really spent money making their product less accessible for no reason.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t really disagree with you. It’s dumb to go out of your way to block an OS that probably works just fine.

      That said, the answer is probably “lawyers” and an attempt to limit liability. People rely on the course materials to work. If they don’t want to out the effort into testing to ensure that their software works on Linux, even if it would probably be fine, they may want to limit the possibility of being sued by someone when it somehow screws up their semester.

      So, they out up a soft barrier that says “this may not work right” but let you use it anyway. They have deniability if something goes wrong while the savvy Linux user probably just laughs and changes their user agent.

      Essentially, no one is hurt and the lawyers are happy.

      • tankfox@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        The motivation from their side is not wanting to support Linux. There’s a difference between working and supported; support costs them money in terms of every phone call from every person for whom the material doesn’t work correctly, as that means paid trained staff on hand all the time whether you’re having linux issues right now or not. Imagine if one person a year had linux issues, requiring them to hire a full time linux tech with nothing to do but pick up the phone once a year. By putting a roadblock in front that people can get around, it can ‘work’ on that system while they have a leg to stand on to say no to any linux user who wants help they can’t provide.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I had this problem over 10 years ago. change your user-agent, problem solved.

    they do it because they are regulations for educational software that must be met, like specific access requirements in order to be used in accredited courses.

    it’s not anything specifically against Linux, it’s that they can’t test and validate those access requirements for anything outside Windows due to organizational limitations.

    source: I worked for colleges early in my career that used Pearson then worked for a vendor that managed infrastructure and project management for Pearson. they aren’t unique, their competition is just as fucked as they are. most still use waterfall because upper mgmt is old and refuses to adapt.

    • cute_noker@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      My bank does this too. I also just change the user agent to switch and it works with no issues.

      At this point it just seems silly that they even want to go out of their way to Prohibit Linux users

  • thorhop@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Upgrade”? Every other option is a downgrade. Sue them for false advertisement.

  • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I had a course where the teacher basically said you would have a hard time passing if you did not have a windows laptop because it was the only OS that worked well with their program.

    The program was Excel workbooks

  • FryHyde@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Very loose interpretation of the word “upgrade” they’re employing here…

    • lambipapp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      I assume it is a generic message, let’s say youd run windows 7. Then this message would sound more reasonable.

      But I agree, this is crazy if it is running in a browser