• xorollo@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So let me tell y’all about the crazies I work with. I burn easily, and there is very little shade, so I store sunscreen everywhere. My desk, the bathroom, my bag, the car, the office supply closet, etc. I often use it and offer to my colleagues when anyone needs to go out for a while.

    We got a new guy on the team, he’s going out, I suggest he take some sunscreen. He tells me that sunscreen is poison and that you don’t really need it as long as you don’t wear sunglasses. He tells me that it’s wearing sunglasses that actually causes you to burn because your eyes don’t get as much sun so your brain doesn’t send the right chemicals out to protect your skin.

  • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    It’s actually irritating to me that the sun is bombarding us with ionizing radiation

    (I know, not the same intensity) but think about the amount of precautions we take before turning on a UV lamp. Or before turning on a very bright LED which you are not supposed to look directly at. Well, neither you should look directly at the sun, but you get the idea

    In a perspective, sun is so radioactive it can even decay paint and plastic! It can literally cook you alive and make your skin fall in pieces. This just seems usual to us because we were born with it, people would freak the hell out if a medical procedure had the same side effects

    Look, I can make a right wing campaign out of this! BAN THE SUN SAVE YOUR KIDS FROM 800T (Terahertz) RADIATION

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    On the other hand, what bullshit is it that my stupid human body can’t survive being outdoors without medicinal cream. My ancestors would be ashamed.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Mud and henna masks and other full skin coverings are extremely common among indigenous people and presumably your ancestors as well.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Maybe tens of thousands of years ago, but 2000ish years ago 60ish was old age. The main reason life expectancy has gone up isn’t that old people didn’t make it to 50, it’s that young people didn’t make it to 2. If a couple has 5 kids, 3 of them die as toddlers and the other two make it to 70 the average life expectancy is about 30, but that doesn’t mean living past 30 is unusual.

        Also, tens of thousands of years ago there was an ice age, but for the last 10k years light-skinned Europeans still had normal summers and worked in the fields.

            • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              No, I mean that for the brunt of humans evolving to be genetically roughly what we are today, it is unlikely many people were living much past their prime. I am talking about roughly 100,000 years ago up to around 10,000 years ago when humans developed from a largely hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

              • People who live a hunter-gatherer lifestyle today live 65+ regularly. The average may be lower for uncontacted peoples for various reasons, or higher because of reduced disease transmission. I imagine it depends on the group.

                Now, I will give you that humans have refined their techniques of hunting etc over that 90k years in a way that caused less accidental deaths.

                The crux of the matter though is that the statistical averages you have seen are flawed by infant mortality. In these societies, if you made it past toddler age you were statistically likely to live a long time.

                What would be killing people much past their “prime” and how do you define prime?

  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    >be me
    >white as everliving fuck
    >put on 60 spf sun screen, as you should, and set a timer for an hour and a half to reapply, earlier than the recommended 2 hours
    >alarm goes off, reapply
    >STILL GET SUNBURNED

    mfw

    • xorollo@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Lotion is good for the first coat, but the spray is so much easier to apply when you’re already sweaty and sand is everywhere.

    • rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I used to have that problem. I switched to 30 spf and don’t get burned anymore. I can’t really explain it, but my theory is that 50+ is marketing BS and doesn’t actually do anything. Or it could be that Banana Boat brand just really sucks and Hawaiian is more like lotion so it actually stays on my skin and also moisturizes, which probably helps because dry skin = gonna get burned.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        The difference between SPF 60 and 100 is like 1.1% better UV blocking, anything over SPF 50 is in a practical sense nearly useless.

        For instance SPF 30 blocks 97% of UVB rays, is it worth paying more and slathering more potentially harmful (to the environment) compounds on your skin for 98% blocking? I think not.

        • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I used to think the same thing, but the thing is we don’t care about the energy that goes into the sunscreen, we care about the remaining percent that goes into the skin. If you go from a sunscreen that absorbs 98% of the sun’s energy to one that absorbs 99% you are halving the amount of energy your skin is exposed to.

          If you’re still getting burned with 98% absorption, then increasing that number by 1% would actually make a huge difference. And that’s without even considering things like having a safety margin for improper application.

        • Bongles@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Seems like in real world use it makes a difference.

          https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0190962219327550

          https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29291958/

          From another thing I read, people have a tendency to not apply enough sunscreen or apply it correctly. I’m sure if everyone did it perfectly it wouldn’t matter. All I know is anecdotally, when I switched to 100 I stopped getting sunburns, and I have been in situations with people who used their own lower spf, got a little burned still, and I came out of it pale white.

          The price might be higher, but a quick look on Amazon and I’m seeing more than spf affecting that. The brand I buy is about 1.80 (usd) per ounce, and i see other brands with less spf for more. I see other brands with the same spf for less, and it seems like it’s between ~1.10 per ounce to ~2.80 per ounce so I’m not really bothered by my price. I don’t know anything about the environmental differences between spf so I won’t comment on that.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          what if your skin has a hit point system and that 1% difference is the breaking point of sunburn

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The average person should almost certainly not be using it, but maybe it would make the difference for extremely sun sensitive people.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The worst is when is a cloudy Summer day and you’re like there’s no sun mf, no need to sunscreen! But you still get burned the fuck out.

  • unalivejoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Not wearing sunscreen and getting a sunburn is a psyop to get men to buy more aloe vera.

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I would wear suncream more often, but:

    1. I’m allergic to something in most brands of suncream so if I run out I’m having to deal with rashes all over where I used it.
    2. I hate how it makes me feel slimy after using it

    There’s this Loreal suncream spray I like that I can’t seem to find that feels like water and when it’s dry, it doesn’t feel like you have suncream on. It’s perfect for me! I’m not allergic to it either so I can actually go in the sun without turning red and blotchy!

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I have autistic sensory issues and the cheapest one I can at all tolerate to have on my skin is 15€ for 50ml. I have so many of the 5-10€ bottles at home and can’t handle any of them. Fml

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      In the city of Utrecht NL they have free sunblock stations spread around the city. It shows the temp and UV rating. But buying it in store is crazy expensive and often the quality is poor. Some fancy tiny spray bottles go up to 12 euros, only good for 3 to 4 uses. wtf. Imagine being ginger, there’s a ginger tax called sunblock.

        • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m not buying the fancy expensive shit. But the cheap stuff fills pores and creates pimples. Also, don’t use the one from last year, it has an expiration date. The protection goes down significantly.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Good point with the expiration date, but the one I have has >1 year, possibly longer since I cannot remember when I bought it

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Cost of living in the UK is up 25% since Brexit happened in 2021.

        “We’ve become the first country in the history of the world to have placed economic sanctions upon itself” -James O’Brien

        We’re a population of morons who will still blame anything but ourselves for the position we’re in.

      • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Here in the Netherlands it’s expensive as well. Like a small bottle of name-brand sunscreen is €30.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I buy the store brand from the local supermarket. €2,99 for a 250 ml bottle of SPF 30 and it works great. I never get sunburn, even during multi hour bike rides in the blazing sun.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If the cream wasn’t such a goddamn sensory nightmare…
    UPF clothes FTW

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I put on sun screen every morning to ward off basal cell skin cancer. It sucks but it’s cheaper than going to the dermatologist to have basal cell skin cancer removed. The worst part is getting it in my eyes. On the plus side, the splotchy age spots on my temples have disappeared

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    My wife can spend all day in the sun and turn a nice shade of brown.

    Not me. There is no “tan” for me. It’s either pasty white or lobster with no middle ground whatsoever.